Update Infisical Secrets Check Action Version to v1.1.0

guibranco commented 3 weeks ago

Description

Upgraded the guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action to version v1.1.0.
This may include new features or bug fixes from the previous version.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

infisical-secrets-check.yml

Update Infisical Secrets Check Action Version

.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml

Updated the version of the
guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action action.

Changed from version v1.0.10 to v1.1.0.

+1/-1

Summary by Sourcery

Update the Infisical secrets check GitHub Action to the latest version in the CI workflow.

CI:

Update the Infisical secrets check GitHub Action to version 1.1.0 in the workflow configuration.

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Upgraded the secrets check action to improve functionality and performance.
Version Updates
- Incremented assembly and file version from 1.0.938.1 to 1.0.939.1, indicating new updates and improvements.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Analyzed 1 of 3 files.

	Filename	Status
:heavy_check_mark:	Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs	Analyzed
:grey_question:	Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/Version.txt	Unsupported file format
:grey_question:	.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml	Unsupported file format

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

You've used up your 5 PR reviews for this month under the Korbit Starter Plan. You'll get 5 more reviews on October 5th, 2024 or you can upgrade to Pro for unlimited PR reviews and enhanced features in your Korbit Console.

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
- Updating the dependency version in the GitHub action to v1.1.0 might introduce compatibility issues or behavior changes as compared to version v1.0.10. It's important to verify if this version update aligns with the project requirements to prevent unexpected issues during the secrets check process.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
- Consider updating this file with a brief comment or description indicating the reason for the version change (e.g., bug fixes, new features, security updates) to provide clarity on the intention behind the dependency upgrade.

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the version of the Infisical secrets check action used in the GitHub workflow. The change is minimal but important for maintaining up-to-date security practices.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Update Infisical secrets check action version	Changed the version of guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action from v1.0.10 to v1.1.0	`.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml`

Tips

- Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments. - You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai): - Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide; - Change the review language; - You can always [contact us](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) if you have any questions or feedback.

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Changes in the diff

🛠️ Updated the version of the guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action from v1.0.10 to v1.1.0.

Identified Issues

None found. The proposed changes are straightforward and involve only a version update of a GitHub action. There are no apparent issues related to mistakes, typos, security, performance, best practices, readability, or other concerns.

Missing Tests

No new tests are necessary for this change as it only updates the version of an action used in a GitHub workflow. The functionality of the workflow should remain the same, assuming the updated action version is backward compatible.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to share your opinion with me!

instapr[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Updated the action version to v1.1.0

net-framework-updater[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Build debug & Version bump: :beginner: Building GHActionsCI.sln

coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow configuration file .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml by upgrading the version of the Infisical secrets check action from v1.0.10 to v1.1.0. Additionally, it increments the assembly version in AssemblyInfo.cs and updates the version number in Version.txt from 1.0.938.1 to 1.0.939.1. These changes reflect a progression in versioning and potential improvements, though specific details are not provided.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
`.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml`	Updated action version from `v1.0.10` to `v1.1.0`
`Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs`	Incremented `AssemblyVersion` and `AssemblyFileVersion` from `1.0.938.1` to `1.0.939.1`
`Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/Version.txt`	Updated version number from `1.0.938.1` to `1.0.939.1`

Possibly related PRs

292: Updates the same workflow file, indicating a connection to the main PR's changes.
302: Involves updates to the same workflow file, suggesting a relationship in workflow modifications.
341: Updates the version of the github-file-reader-action in the same workflow file, relevant to the main PR.
346: Continues to update the github-file-reader-action in the same workflow file, maintaining relevance.
356: Introduces enhancements to the same workflow file, directly impacting the main PR's focus.
382: Enhances the same workflow file, closely related to the changes in the main PR.
385: Simplifies the workflow in the same file, indicating a relationship with the main PR's updates.
393: Updates the version of the action in the same workflow file, aligning with the main PR's focus.

🐰 In the garden, secrets bloom,
A workflow change dispels the gloom.
With version upgraded, we hop with glee,
Enhancements await, as bright as can be!
So let’s celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For every little change brings us near! 🌼

Recent review details

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 071673d710b28abdae97242de76e3628908c0c2a and 619942c44455ff1cd7e4ccaeb9eeb35311f7cdd2.

Files selected for processing (2)

* Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs (1 hunks) * Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/Version.txt (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)

* Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs * Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/Version.txt

--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

penify-dev[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	1, because the change is a simple version update with no complex logic or significant alterations.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

penify-dev[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Security	Pin the action to a specific commit SHA for enhanced stability ___ Consider pinning the action to a specific commit SHA for more stability, rather than using a version tag. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [26]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework/pull/394/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R26-R26) ```diff -uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.0 +uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@ ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Pinning to a specific commit SHA enhances stability and security, making this a highly valuable suggestion for production environments.	9
Best practice	Test the new action version in a staging environment prior to production use ___ Ensure that the new version v1.1.0 is tested in a staging environment before deploying to production to avoid potential disruptions. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [26]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework/pull/394/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R26-R26) ```diff +uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.0 - ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Testing in a staging environment is a best practice that can prevent disruptions in production, making this a significant suggestion.	8
Possible issue	Verify the compatibility of the new action version with the existing workflow ___ Consider verifying the changelog or release notes for version v1.1.0 to ensure there are no breaking changes or issues that could affect the workflow. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [26]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework/pull/394/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R26-R26) ```diff +uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.0 - ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion is relevant as it encourages checking for potential breaking changes, which is important when updating dependencies, but it does not directly address a critical issue.	7
Maintainability	Check for any new configuration requirements in the updated action version ___ Review the action's documentation for any new required parameters or configuration changes introduced in version v1.1.0. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [26]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework/pull/394/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R26-R26) ```diff +uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.0 - ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: This suggestion promotes maintainability by ensuring that the new version is properly configured, but it is less critical than testing in a staging environment.	6

net-framework-updater[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Build debug & Version bump: :dart: Build succeeded - New version: 1.0.939.1

net-framework-updater[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Build debug & Version bump: :white_check_mark: Successfully builded and patched GHActionsCI.sln.

Version: :hash: 1.0.939.1 Warnings: :warning:

D:\a\POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework\POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework\Src\GHActionsCI\Program.cs(27,20): warning S1118: Add a 'protected' constructor or the 'static' keyword to the class declaration. (https://rules.sonarsource.com/csharp/RSPEC-1118) [D:\a\POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework\POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework\Src\GHActionsCI\GHActionsCI.csproj]

codeclimate[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Code Climate has analyzed commit 619942c4 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

github-actions[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

```txt 3:14PM INF scanning for exposed secrets... 3:14PM INF 265 commits scanned. 3:14PM INF scan completed in 572ms 3:14PM INF no leaks found ```

GuilhermeStracini / POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework