Update README.md

[guibranco]

Resolves #ISSUE_NUMBER

---

Before the change?

After the change?

Pull request checklist

• [X] Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features)
• [X] Docs have been reviewed and added/updated if needed (for bug fixes/features)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

• [X] Yes
• [ ] No

---

Summary by Sourcery

Update the README.md to enhance documentation on the CI/CD pipeline for a .NET Framework project, detailing the pipeline features, workflow, and contribution guidelines.

Documentation:

• Revise the README.md to provide a comprehensive overview of the CI/CD pipeline for a .NET Framework 4.8 project using GitHub Actions, including setup, build, test, code quality analysis, and deployment processes.
• Add a detailed 'Getting Started' section to guide users on prerequisites, cloning the repository, customizing workflows, running locally, and pushing changes to trigger the pipeline.
• Include a 'Contribution' section to encourage community involvement and contributions to the project.

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Revise the README.md to provide a comprehensive overview of the GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline for a .NET Framework project, detailing features, steps to use, and guidelines for contribution.

Why are these changes being made?

The changes offer a more organized and detailed description of the project's setup, functionality, and usage instructions, which enhances understanding and fosters easier adoption and contributions from other developers. This update aims to improve accessibility and encourage community involvement.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the formatting and structure of the README.md file for clarity and consistency.
  • Introduced an "Overview" section with a brief description and a link to a related blog article.
  • Added a "Features" section highlighting key aspects of the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Included a "Pipeline Workflow" section with a visual diagram of the GitHub Actions workflow.
  • Restructured the "Getting Started" section into "Prerequisites" and "Steps to Use."
  • Added sections for "Contribution" and "License" to encourage community involvement.

[semanticdiff-com[bot]]

Review changes with  

[sourcery-ai[bot]]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR significantly improves the README.md documentation by restructuring and expanding its content. The changes include adding detailed sections about the project's features, pipeline workflow, getting started guide, and contribution guidelines. A mermaid diagram has been added to visualize the pipeline workflow.

Pipeline Workflow Diagram in README.md

graph TD
    A[GitHub Actions Trigger] --> B[Checkout Code]
    B --> C[Configure Environment]
    C --> D[Restore Dependencies]
    D --> E[Build Project]
    E --> F[Test Project]
    F --> G{Code Quality Analysis}
    G -->|Pass| H[Upload Artifacts via FTP]
    G -->|Fail| I[Stop Pipeline]
    H --> J[Request Deployment Approval]
    J --> K[Deploy via SSH]

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Enhanced project title and badges section	Updated project title to be more descriptive Improved badge labels for better clarity Reorganized badge layout	README.md
Added comprehensive project overview and features section	Added detailed overview section with blog reference Created structured features section with pipeline highlights Added bullet points for environment setup, build/test, code quality, and deployment features	README.md
Implemented pipeline workflow visualization	Added mermaid diagram showing the complete CI/CD workflow Visualized pipeline steps from trigger to deployment	README.md
Added detailed getting started guide	Created prerequisites section Added step-by-step installation and usage instructions Included code snippets for common commands	README.md
Added project metadata sections	Added contribution guidelines Added license information Improved overall document structure with proper section breaks	README.md

---

Tips and commands

#### Interacting with Sourcery - **Trigger a new review:** Comment `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - **Continue discussions:** Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments. - **Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment:** Ask Sourcery to create an issue from a review comment by replying to it. - **Generate a pull request title:** Write `@sourcery-ai` anywhere in the pull request title to generate a title at any time. - **Generate a pull request summary:** Write `@sourcery-ai summary` anywhere in the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use this command to specify where the summary should be inserted. #### Customizing Your Experience Access your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai) to: - Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request summary, the reviewer's guide, and others. - Change the review language. - Add, remove or edit custom review instructions. - Adjust other review settings. #### Getting Help - [Contact our support team](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) for questions or feedback. - Visit our [documentation](https://docs.sourcery.ai) for detailed guides and information. - Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on [X/Twitter](https://x.com/SourceryAI), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/sourcery-ai/) or [GitHub](https://github.com/sourcery-ai).

[pr-code-reviewer[bot]]

:wave: Hi there!

1. Consistency: Maintain consistent naming conventions and casing for elements like "CI Pipeline" and "GitHub Actions."
2. Formatting: Ensure proper alignment and spacing for readability, especially in badge links.
3. Link Validity: Confirm that all URLs, such as those for badges, are correct and functioning.

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

[instapr[bot]]

Feedback

• Updated README content looks good and provides clear information about the project.
• Make sure to keep the README concise and organized for better readability.
• Consider breaking down long sections into smaller, more digestible parts.
• Ensure consistent formatting and style throughout the document for better visual appeal.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Walkthrough

The changes in the README.md file include updates to formatting, structure, and content. The title and badges have been standardized for consistency. A new "Overview" section has been added, describing the repository as a proof of concept for a CI/CD pipeline with .NET Framework 4.8 and GitHub Actions, along with a link to a related blog article. The "Features" section outlines key aspects of the pipeline, while a "Pipeline Workflow" section includes a mermaid diagram of the GitHub Actions workflow. The "Getting Started" section has been restructured, and new sections for "Contribution" and "License" have been introduced.

Changes

File	Change Summary
README.md	- Title and badges updated for consistent capitalization.
	- New "Overview" section added with a description and blog link.
	- "Features" section added, outlining key highlights in bullet points.
	- "Pipeline Workflow" section added with a mermaid diagram of the GitHub Actions workflow.
	- "Getting Started" section restructured into "Prerequisites" and "Steps to Use."
	- New sections for "Contribution" and "License" added.

Possibly related PRs

• 356: Enhances the infisical-secrets-check.yml workflow, relevant due to modifications in the same workflow file.

• 382: Focuses on enhancing the infisical-secrets-check.yml workflow, making it directly related to the changes in the main PR.

• 394: Updates the version of the action used in the infisical-secrets-check.yml, relevant to the workflow changes discussed in the main PR.

Suggested labels

size/S, enhancement, korbit-code-analysis, Review effort [1-5]: 3

🐰 In the README, we’ve made it bright,
With features and workflows, all in sight.
An overview to guide, and steps to explore,
Contributions welcomed, come one, come more!
With badges that shine, and clarity too,
Hop in, dear friends, there’s much we can do! 🌟

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[gooroo-dev[bot]]

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues Counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Changes in the Diff

• 📖 Improved readability by updating badge labels to use consistent capitalization.
• ➕ Added a detailed overview section explaining the purpose of the repository.
• ➕ Introduced a features section to highlight key aspects of the pipeline.
• ➕ Added a mermaid diagram to visually represent the pipeline workflow.
• ➕ Provided a getting started section with prerequisites and usage steps.
• ➕ Included a contribution section to encourage community involvement.
• ➕ Added a license section to clarify the project's licensing.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence
1	💪Best Practices	Consider adding a section on how to handle secrets securely in the pipeline.	🟠Medium	🟠Medium

Detailed Issue Explanations and Fixes

ID 1: Best Practices

Issue:
The README does not include information on handling secrets securely in the CI/CD pipeline. This is important for maintaining security best practices.

File Path: README.md

Suggested Fix:
Add a section on handling secrets securely using GitHub Secrets or other secure methods.

## Security Best Practices

Ensure that any sensitive information, such as API keys or passwords, is stored securely. Use GitHub Secrets to manage these securely within your workflows. Refer to [GitHub's documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/encrypted-secrets) for more details.

Explanation:
Adding this section will guide users to handle sensitive information securely, thus adhering to best practices and preventing potential security risks.

Missing Tests

The changes in the README.md file do not involve code execution, so no additional tests are required. However, ensure that any scripts or code referenced in the documentation are covered by existing tests in the repository.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev I'd love to hear your thoughts! React or reply.

[guibranco]

@gstraccini create labels

[codara-ai-code-review[bot]]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

1. README Ambiguity in Features - README.md lacks clarity on the exact dependencies required for the features listed in the "Code Quality and Security" and "Deployment" sections. For instance, it's unclear which specific tools or accounts are needed (e.g., SonarCloud, Snyk) for the pipeline to function effectively.

2. Lack of Instructions on Approval Process - In the "Deployment" section under "Pipeline Highlights", there’s a mention of requesting approval for deployment, but there are no guidelines or examples on how this approval is to be handled. This could lead to confusion in actual implementations.

3. Security Concerns with SSH - The instruction to "Login to SSH and execute commands" should include a section on securing these SSH credentials and a reminder to avoid hardcoding sensitive information.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

1. Clarify Prerequisites Requirements - In README.md, under the "Prerequisites" section, provide clearer instructions on how to install the necessary tools and any specific versions that are important for compatibility with the .NET Framework 4.8.

2. Consistent Use of Terminology - Standardize the terminology used throughout the document. For instance, ensure that "Code Quality" and "Code Quality and Security" are used consistently to avoid confusion. Consider using subheadings or consistent wording when referring to tools or concepts.

3. Include Troubleshooting Section - Add a "Troubleshooting" section in README.md to help users diagnose common issues that may arise while building or deploying the project. This can improve the usability of the document significantly.

4. Better Section Formatting - Use consistent Markdown formatting in lists. The transition from bullet points to numbered lists should have a clear structure. Ensure to separate any informational content from commands for better readability.

5. Include Example Outputs or Expected Results - In the "Steps to Use" section, consider providing sample outputs or expected results after each command to aid users in understanding successful execution. This will help gauge if they are on the right path or if something has gone wrong.

6. Contributing Guidelines - The "Contribution" section could benefit from links to specific issues, a code of conduct, and a checklist for pull requests to guide potential contributors on how to help effectively.

[gstraccini[bot]]

Creating 17 labels and updating 15 labels! :label:

[github-actions[bot]]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

```txt 6:07PM INF scanning for exposed secrets... 6:07PM INF 303 commits scanned. 6:07PM INF scan completed in 579ms 6:07PM INF no leaks found ```

[net-framework-updater[bot]]

Build debug & Version bump: :alien: Not building GHActionsCI.sln, no source files changed.