search

GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-CQRS

🔬 Proof of Concept of CQRS pattern in .NET using RabbitMQ, ReBus, State Machine, MediatR and Docker
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-dotnet-CQRS/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Bump guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.1.552 to 2.2.583 #24

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 2 months ago

dependabot[bot] commented 2 months ago

Bumps guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.1.552 to 2.2.583.

Release notes

Sourced from guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2's releases.

Release v2.2.583

Release 2.2.583 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.2.580...v2.2.583

Release v2.2.580

Release 2.2.580 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.2.578...v2.2.580

Release v2.2.578

Release 2.2.578 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.2.574...v2.2.578

Release v2.2.574

Release 2.2.574 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.1.571...v2.2.574

Release v2.1.571

Release 2.1.571 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.1.569...v2.1.571

Release v2.1.570

Release 2.1.570 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.1.566...v2.1.570

Release v2.1.569

Release 2.1.569 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.1.566...v2.1.569

Release v2.1.566

Release 2.1.566 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

... (truncated)

Commits


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.

Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
korbit-ai[bot] commented 2 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 months ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

[!TIP]

Early access features: enabled We are currently testing the following features in early access: - **OpenAI `gpt-4o` model for code reviews and chat**: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available. Note: - You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file. - Please join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to provide feedback and report issues. - OSS projects are currently opted into early access features by default.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 2 months ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. :tada: To get the most out of Senior Dev, please sign up in our Web App, connect your GitHub account, and add/join your organization GuilhermeStracini. After that, you will receive code reviews beginning on your next opened PR. :rocket:

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 2 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 2 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml:
    • Repeating the step "Read secrets-result.log" twice with different conditions (if: always() and if: failure()) might lead to confusion and potentially duplicate processing of the same file. Consider consolidating these into a single step if the intention is to read the file only once.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml:
    • Update the uses version for the github-file-reader-action-v2 to v2.2.583 consistently in both occurrences to ensure using the same version throughout the workflow for consistency.
    • If the intention is to differentiate the processing of the log file based on success or failure, consider revising the conditions to make the divergence clearer to readers of the workflow. Alternatively, if the processing is the same in both cases, it would be more optimal to consolidate the steps.
gooroo-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

Issue Counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Summary of Proposed Changes

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the proposed changes.

General Review

The proposed changes are straightforward and involve updating the version of a GitHub Action used in the workflow. The code quality and style are consistent with best practices for maintaining dependency versions in CI/CD pipelines. No issues were found in the incoming changes.

Yours, Gooroo.dev Add a reaction or reply to share your thoughts!

guibranco commented 2 months ago

@dependabot squash and merge