search

GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-CQRS

🔬 Proof of Concept of CQRS pattern in .NET using RabbitMQ, ReBus, State Machine, MediatR and Docker
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-dotnet-CQRS/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Add basic structure #29

Closed guibranco closed 3 months ago

guibranco commented 3 months ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Analyzed 3 of 18 files.

Filename Status
:grey_question: .csharpierrc.yaml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .deepsource.toml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .gitignore Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .wakatime-project Unsupported file format
:grey_question: CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md Unsupported file format
:grey_question: LICENSE Unsupported file format
:grey_question: POCTemplate.sln Unsupported file format
:grey_question: Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/POCTemplate.Tests.csproj Unsupported file format
:heavy_check_mark: Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/UnitTest1.cs Analyzed
:grey_question: Src/POCTemplate/POCTemplate.csproj Unsupported file format
:heavy_check_mark: Src/POCTemplate/Program.cs Analyzed
:grey_question: .github/dependabot.yml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .github/workflows/build.yml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .github/workflows/deep-source.yml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .github/workflows/linter.yml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .github/workflows/size-label.yml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .githooks/pre-commit Unsupported file format
:heavy_check_mark: .config/dotnet-tools.json Analyzed
korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.config/dotnet-tools.json:

    • The file is missing a newline at the end of the file. It is recommended to add a newline at the end for better consistency.

  2. /.githooks/pre-commit:

    • The script does not handle potential failures in the dotnet tool restore and dotnet csharpier commands. If these commands fail, the script should ideally exit with a non-zero status to indicate the failure.

  3. /.github/dependabot.yml:

    • In the dependabot.yml file, the indentation is inconsistent. For example, the open-pull-requests-limit is aligned differently under nuget compared to github-actions. Maintaining consistent indentation would improve readability.

  4. /.github/workflows/deep-source.yml:

    • The dotnet build and dotnet test commands should include error handling in case they fail. Handling failures gracefully would provide better feedback in case of build or test failures.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.githooks/pre-commit:

    • Improve the regular expression for branch name validation to provide more descriptive error messages. Currently, the error message is quite generic. Providing specific details on why the branch name is invalid can be helpful to users.

  2. /.deepsource.toml:

    • Consider providing configurations for the secrets and csharp analyzers similar to the test-coverage analyzer. Consistency in configuring analyzers would make the file more uniform and easier to manage.

  3. /.github/dependabot.yml:

    • Add comments to explain the purpose of the configurations for each package ecosystem. Comments can serve as documentation for future maintainers.

  4. /.github/workflows/build.yml:

    • Consider adding steps to handle or report failures in the build and test processes. Including notifications or additional actions on build or test failure can help in promptly addressing issues.

  5. /.github/workflows/deep-source.yml:

    • Ensure that the dotnet build and dotnet test commands run successfully before proceeding with coverage analysis. Verifying successful build and test execution is crucial before generating coverage reports.

  6. /.github/workflows/linter.yml:

    • Consider capturing and displaying the output of dotnet csharpier . --check command to provide more context in case formatting issues are found. This can assist developers in understanding and fixing the reported issues.

  7. /.github/workflows/size-label.yml:

    • Document the purpose of the job and how the size-label action affects the workflow. Providing clear documentation can help in understanding the workflow's intent and usage.
coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@korbit-ai[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 15 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue? After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
How do rate limits work? CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.
Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61cde7082798ced5979df7cd378c9d4a2f516e41 and e4b34026a3bab9195eb2145daa7e794458d8661e.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce various configuration files, GitHub workflows, and code components for a .NET project. New tools such as CSharpier for formatting and DeepSource for code analysis are set up. GitHub Actions workflows automate builds, linting, and labeling pull requests by size. A solution structure is defined with a "Hello, World!" program and initial unit tests. A Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct and MIT License update foster a collaborative and legally compliant project environment.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.config/dotnet-tools.json, .csharpierrc.yaml Introduce csharpier tool configuration and settings for code formatting.
.deepsource.toml Add DeepSource analyzer configurations for test coverage, secrets, and C#.
.githooks/pre-commit Adds a pre-commit hook script to enforce branch name conventions and run formatting checks.
.github/dependabot.yml Update Dependabot settings for NuGet and GitHub Actions package ecosystems.
.github/workflows/build.yml, .github/workflows/deep-source.yml, .github/workflows/linter.yml, .github/workflows/size-label.yml Add GitHub Actions workflows for building, analyzing, and labeling the codebase.
.gitignore Update .gitignore to exclude various files and directories related to Visual Studio and builds.
.wakatime-project Introduce a WakaTime project file for tracking coding time on a .NET CQRS POC.
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md Add Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct to ensure a welcoming project environment.
LICENSE Update copyright year from 2023 to 2024.
POCTemplate.sln Introduce a solution file defining the project structure and relationships.
Src/POCTemplate/POCTemplate.csproj, Src/POCTemplate/Program.cs Add a new .NET project with a basic "Hello, World!" application.
Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/POCTemplate.Tests.csproj, Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/UnitTest1.cs Introduce a test project with initial unit tests and necessary dependencies.

Poem

In the land of code where bunnies prance,
We’ve added new tools to enhance our dance.
With CSharpier’s grace and DeepSource’s keen eye,
Our builds now reach for the sky.
GitHub actions whirl in a choreographed trance,
Ensuring our project gets a chance.
So hop along, code on, in this wondrous expanse!

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
instapr[bot] commented 3 months ago 
PR Feedback:
- A comprehensive list of files and configurations have been added successfully.
- Ensure all files end with a newline character for consistency.
- Great inclusion of the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md file.
- Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of newly added files or configurations for better maintainability.
codeclimate[bot] commented 3 months ago

Code Climate has analyzed commit e4b34026 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 months ago

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 2 1 1

Summary of Proposed Changes

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 💪Best Practices Missing newline at the end of .config/dotnet-tools.json 🟡Low 🟢High
2 💪Best Practices Missing newline at the end of .csharpierrc.yaml 🟡Low 🟢High
3 📖Readability Placeholder comment in Program.cs could be more descriptive 🟡Low 🟢High
4 ❓Others The CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md email address should be verified 🟠Medium 🟠Medium

Issue 1

Type: 💪Best Practices
Details: Missing newline at the end of .config/dotnet-tools.json.
Severity: 🟡Low
Confidence: 🟢High 

{
    "version": 1,
    "isRoot": true,
    "tools": {
      "csharpier": {
        "version": "0.28.2",
        "commands": [
          "dotnet-csharpier"
        ]
      }
    }
}

Fix: Add a newline at the end of the file to follow JSON formatting best practices.

Issue 2

Type: 💪Best Practices
Details: Missing newline at the end of .csharpierrc.yaml.
Severity: 🟡Low
Confidence: 🟢High 

endOfLine: auto

Fix: Add a newline at the end of the file to follow YAML formatting best practices.

Issue 3

Type: 📖Readability
Details: Placeholder comment in Program.cs could be more descriptive.
Severity: 🟡Low
Confidence: 🟢High 

internal static class Program
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        // Entry point of the application. Add your code here.
        Console.WriteLine("Hello, World!");
    }
}

Fix: Update the comment to be more descriptive about its purpose.

Issue 4

Type: ❓Others
Details: The CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md email address should be verified.
Severity: 🟠Medium
Confidence: 🟠Medium

Fix: Ensure that the email address code-of-conduct@straccini.com is valid and monitored.

General Review

The proposed changes add a basic structure for the project, including configuration files for tools, workflows for CI/CD, and a code of conduct. The code quality is generally good, but there are minor issues related to best practices and readability. The most important issues are the missing newlines in configuration files and the need for a more descriptive comment in the main program file. Additionally, the email address in the code of conduct should be verified.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to keep the discussion going!

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

12:26AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:26AM INF 28 commits scanned.
12:26AM INF scan completed in 64.2ms
12:26AM INF no leaks found
korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

I have reviewed your code and found 4 potential issues. To discuss my individual comments that I have added, tag me in replies using @korbit-ai.

Please react with a 👍 to my comments that you find helpful and a 👎 to those you find unhelpful - this will help me learn and improve as we collaborate.