Fix sonar cloud report

[guibranco]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated build and analysis workflow to include project build and test commands.

[semanticdiff-com[bot]]

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

[korbit-ai[bot]]

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

[pr-code-reviewer[bot]]

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

[instapr[bot]]

Feedback

• The changes in the .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml file seem appropriate.
• It's good to see the addition of dotnet build and dotnet test commands.

Overall, the PR looks good.

[codara-ai-code-review[bot]]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

1. sonar-cloud.yml:
   • In the GitHub workflow file, the commands dotnet build and dotnet test are added directly in the Build and analyze job without checking for the success of dotnet build before running dotnet test. This can lead to running tests on a potentially failing build, resulting in inaccurate test results.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

1. sonar-cloud.yml:
   • Consider adding a conditional check after dotnet build to ensure the build is successful before proceeding with dotnet test. This can be achieved by checking the exit code of dotnet build before running dotnet test.
   • It's a good practice to separate the build and test steps in the workflow to ensure clear visibility and maintainability of the process. Consider splitting these into separate steps or jobs for better readability and maintainability.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

[!CAUTION]

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The recent update to the .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml file focuses on enhancing the build and analysis job for a project. It involves adding commands to build and test the project using dotnet build and dotnet test, and includes setting up environment variables for GitHub and SonarCloud tokens.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml	Added dotnet build and dotnet test commands; set up environment variables for GitHub and SonarCloud tokens.

Poem

In the realm of code so bright, Builds and tests now take flight. With tokens set and dotnet's might, Sonar works through day and night. Hopping smoothly, bugs in sight, Our project's future, shining light. 🐰✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[gooroo-dev[bot]]

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issue Counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	1	0

Summary of Proposed Changes

• ✅ Removed unnecessary comment about the GITHUB_TOKEN.
• ➕ Added dotnet build and dotnet test commands to the workflow.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence
1	📖Readability	The comment # Needed to get PR information, if any was removed, which might reduce clarity.	🟡Low	🟡Low

Issue 1: Comment Removal

Explanation

The comment # Needed to get PR information, if any was removed from the GITHUB_TOKEN line. While this does not affect functionality, it might reduce clarity for future maintainers who may not immediately understand the purpose of the GITHUB_TOKEN.

Suggested Code

         env:
           GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}  # Needed to get PR information, if any
           SONAR_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}

Explanation of Fix

Re-adding the comment will help maintain clarity and understanding of the purpose of the GITHUB_TOKEN for future developers.

General Review

The proposed changes are generally good and improve the functionality of the workflow by adding build and test steps. However, the removal of the comment might slightly reduce readability. Re-adding the comment would maintain clarity without affecting functionality.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Add a reaction or reply to share your feedback!

[codeclimate[bot]]

Code Climate has analyzed commit 0f6f9d4a and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

[korbit-ai[bot]]

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!

---

Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

[github-actions[bot]]

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

12:30AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:30AM INF 29 commits scanned.
12:30AM INF scan completed in 66.6ms
12:30AM INF no leaks found