GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-CQRS

🔬 Proof of Concept of CQRS pattern in .NET using RabbitMQ, ReBus, State Machine, MediatR and Docker
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-dotnet-CQRS/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Update sonar-cloud.yml #32

Closed guibranco closed 3 months ago

guibranco commented 3 months ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml
    • The build job is removed without any indication of replacing it with the sonarcloud job, which could lead to confusion if not intended.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml
    • Consider adding a comment or a descriptive message to clarify the purpose of the sonarcloud job since it replaces the previous build job.
    • Add more specific error handling and logging in the workflow steps to provide better insight if any failure occurs during the process.
    • Ensure consistent formatting in step definitions (e.g., consistent indentation, spacing) for better readability and maintenance.
coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

[!CAUTION]

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

These changes update the SonarCloud CI workflow configuration in .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml. The workflow now runs on Ubuntu instead of Windows and includes several new steps. These steps set up JDK 11, check out the code, set up .NET version 8.0.x, install dependencies, and modify the dotnet test command to collect XPlat Code Coverage during testing.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml Renamed build job to sonarcloud, switched OS from windows-latest to ubuntu-latest, added steps for JDK 11, code checkout, .NET setup, dependency installation, and modified dotnet test command to collect XPlat Code Coverage.

Poem

In the land of code, where workflows roam,
A change has come, on Ubuntu's dome.
JDK and .NET, in harmony dance,
With coverage collected, tests enhance.
A rabbit's joy, in every commit,
For quality's crown, we now transmit. 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 months ago

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issue Counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Summary of Proposed Changes

Identified Issues

No issues identified in the proposed changes.

General Review

The code quality and style are good. The changes are straightforward and improve the workflow by:

  1. Switching to an ubuntu-latest runner, which is generally faster and more commonly used for CI/CD pipelines.
  2. Adding steps to set up .NET and install dependencies, ensuring the environment is correctly configured.
  3. Enhancing the dotnet test command to collect code coverage, which is useful for quality assurance.

No significant issues were found, and the changes align with best practices for CI/CD workflows.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to give your feedback!

instapr[bot] commented 3 months ago
### Feedback ###

- Consider reviewing the indentation of the file for consistency.
- Make sure to have proper spacing between steps for better readability.
- It seems you added the `sonarcloud` job, but did not remove the `build` job. Confirm if this was intentional.
codeclimate[bot] commented 3 months ago

Code Climate has analyzed commit f48186d4 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

1:21AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
1:21AM INF 31 commits scanned.
1:21AM INF scan completed in 65.9ms
1:21AM INF no leaks found