GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-CQRS

🔬 Proof of Concept of CQRS pattern in .NET using RabbitMQ, ReBus, State Machine, MediatR and Docker
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-dotnet-CQRS/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Update sonar-cloud.yml #33

Closed guibranco closed 3 months ago

guibranco commented 3 months ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

[!CAUTION]

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The Sonar Cloud workflow has been significantly updated. Key alterations include renaming the workflow and job, switching the operating system to Windows, modifying Java setup, updating cache paths, streamlining SonarCloud scanner installation, and refining build and analysis steps. Environment variables were also updated, and unnecessary steps related to .NET setup were removed.

Changes

Files Change Summaries
.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml - Renamed the workflow and job
- Changed OS to Windows
- Updated Java setup
- Adjusted cache paths
- Refined installation and analysis steps
- Updated environment variables
- Removed .NET setup and dependencies

Poem

In code's realm, a change was made, To streamline tasks and clear the fray, From Linux to Windows, paths were laid, With Java set, let Sonar play. Tokens aligned, cache paths arrayed, Analysis brightens our dev-filled day.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml:
    • The job name was changed from sonarcloud to SonarCloudAnalysis, but the job ID remains the same. This inconsistency could cause confusion.
    • In the Set up Java step, the java-version input is defined before the distribution input, which could lead to incorrect behavior as the order matters.
    • The comment in the fetch-depth input setting might be misleading. It mentions disabling shallow clones for better analysis relevance but the fetch-depth is set to 0, which is disabling shallow clones for this checkout action.
    • The commented out steps for .NET setup, installing dependencies, and handling of PR information are present but not being used. They should be cleaned up to avoid confusion.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml:
    • Update the job ID in the SonarCloudAnalysis job to match the new job name for consistency.
    • Reorder the distribution input before the java-version input in the Set up Java step for clearer readability and correct execution.
    • Consider updating the comment in the fetch-depth input setting for clarity on why shallow clones are being disabled.
    • Remove the redundant or unnecessary commented-out .NET setup, dependency installation, and PR information handling steps to avoid confusion and maintain a clean workflow file.
instapr[bot] commented 3 months ago
**Feedback:**

- Please review the changes made to the workflow name from `Sonar Cloud Analysis` to `Sonar Cloud`.
- Consider addressing the altered runs-on OS `ubuntu-latest` being switched to `windows-latest`.
- The removal of setup JDK 11 and setting up Java might impact the build, please verify.
- Ensure the adjustments to the cache paths `~\sonar\cache` and `.\.sonar\scanner` are intended.
- Double-check the changes made to the command for `dotnet test`.
gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 months ago

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
1 0 0 0 1 2 0

Summary of Proposed Changes

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 🐞Mistake Changed runner from ubuntu-latest to windows-latest may cause compatibility issues. 🔴High 🟠Medium
2 💪Best Practices Using ~\sonar\cache for cache path might be less portable. 🟠Medium 🟠Medium
3 📖Readability Comment # Needed to get PR information, if any is redundant as it is already clear from the context. 🟡Low 🟡Low

Issue 1

Explanation: Changing the runner from ubuntu-latest to windows-latest might introduce compatibility issues with certain tools or scripts that are more commonly used or tested on Linux environments.

Fix: Revert the runner to ubuntu-latest unless there is a specific need for Windows.

-    runs-on: windows-latest
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

Explanation of the Fix: This change ensures compatibility with the majority of CI/CD tools and scripts which are generally tested on Linux environments.

Issue 2

Explanation: Using ~\sonar\cache for the cache path might not be portable across different operating systems.

Fix: Use a more portable path for caching.

-           path: ~\sonar\cache
+           path: .sonar/cache

Explanation of the Fix: This change makes the cache path more portable and avoids potential issues with different file path conventions on different operating systems.

Issue 3

Explanation: The comment # Needed to get PR information, if any is redundant and does not add value.

Fix: Remove the redundant comment.

-          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}  # Needed to get PR information, if any
+          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

Explanation of the Fix: This change removes unnecessary comments, improving the readability of the code.

General Review

The proposed changes generally improve the readability and organization of the workflow file. However, changing the runner to windows-latest might introduce compatibility issues, and some paths and comments could be improved for better portability and clarity.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Your feedback is important! Please react or reply.

codeclimate[bot] commented 3 months ago

Code Climate has analyzed commit 244042f1 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

6:46PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
6:46PM INF 32 commits scanned.
6:46PM INF scan completed in 63.8ms
6:46PM INF no leaks found