Closed guibranco closed 3 months ago
My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!
Feedback: The PR body is empty. Make sure to add a descriptive summary of the changes made in the pull request for better clarity.
validateEmail
function only checks for a minimum length of 5 characters in the email string, which may not be a sufficient email validation. Consider using a regular expression or a more robust email validation library for accurate email format validation.validatePassword
function, it would be beneficial to explicitly mention the minimum required length in the error message to provide more context to the user if the validation fails.validateEmail
and validatePassword
functions for better code documentation.Code Readability: Simplify complex logic, use meaningful variable names, and adhere to consistent formatting for better understanding.
Performance Optimization: Identify and refactor inefficient algorithms or operations to enhance code efficiency.
Error Handling: Implement robust error handling mechanisms to manage exceptions and edge cases effectively.
The description could be more helpful.
Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.
Currently, I support these languages:
I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!
Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.
Code Climate has analyzed commit c95d8550 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.
View more on Code Climate.
Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!
Scan results:
6:54PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
6:54PM INF 32 commits scanned.
6:54PM INF scan completed in 64.9ms
6:54PM INF no leaks found
Review changes with SemanticDiff.