Update .deepsource.toml

[guibranco]

Description by Korbit AI

[!NOTE] This feature is in early access. You can enable or disable it in the Korbit Console.

What change is being made?

Add test patterns and Docker analyzer to .deepsource.toml.

Why are these changes being made?

The addition of test_patterns improves test coverage analysis by specifying the directory for test files, and the inclusion of the Docker analyzer enhances the static analysis capabilities for Docker files, ensuring better code quality and security.

[semanticdiff-com[bot]]

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

[korbit-ai[bot]]

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

[instapr[bot]]

The addition of the 'docker' analyzer looks good. Let's stick to the convention and keep the properties aligned in the .deepsource.toml file.

[codara-ai-code-review[bot]]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

1. /.deepsource.toml - The test-coverage analyzer is enabled without specifying any configuration. This might lead to misleading or incorrect test coverage results if the analyzer does not have a proper setup.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

1. /.deepsource.toml - When enabling the test-coverage analyzer, ensure that the configuration is properly set up to accurately calculate test coverage results. If no configuration is needed, add a comment clarifying this decision.
2. /.deepsource.toml - It's recommended to have consistent spacing and alignment for better readability.

[pr-code-reviewer[bot]]

:wave: Hi there!

1. Consistency: Ensure uniform formatting by aligning the "+", "name", and "enabled" fields.
2. Organization: Place new analyzer configurations in proper order within the file for clarity and maintainability.
3. Documentation: Add comments or descriptions to explain the purpose or function of each analyzer added or modified.

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

[coderabbitai[bot]]

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 094901c7dd3a702b06259b9e5ac4d933a3ce1143 and f50ad0e408814e679b9d1f524019b7c6a5d819d0.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[gooroo-dev[bot]]

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issue Counts Table

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	1	0	0

Summary of Proposed Changes

• ➕ Added test_patterns to specify test directories.
• ➕ Added docker analyzer configuration.
• ➖ Removed enabled = true from test-coverage analyzer.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence
1	💪Best Practices	The enabled = true line for the test-coverage analyzer was removed.	🟠Medium	🟠Medium

Issue Explanations and Fixes

ID 1: Missing enabled = true for test-coverage Analyzer

Issue: The enabled = true line for the test-coverage analyzer was removed, which might disable the analyzer unintentionally.

Location: .deepsource.toml lines 5-6.

Fix:

[[analyzers]]
name = "test-coverage"
+enabled = true

Explanation: Re-adding the enabled = true line ensures that the test-coverage analyzer is active.

General Review

The changes generally improve the configuration by adding new analyzers and specifying test patterns. However, the removal of the enabled = true line for the test-coverage analyzer could disable it unintentionally, which is not recommended. Re-adding this line will ensure the analyzer remains active. The code style and structure are clear and follow best practices, except for the identified issue.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev I'd love to hear your thoughts! React or reply.

[korbit-ai[bot]]

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!

---

Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

[codeclimate[bot]]

Code Climate has analyzed commit f50ad0e4 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

[github-actions[bot]]

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

2:01PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
2:01PM INF 36 commits scanned.
2:01PM INF scan completed in 71.1ms
2:01PM INF no leaks found