GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-CQRS

🔬 Proof of Concept of CQRS pattern in .NET using RabbitMQ, ReBus, State Machine, MediatR and Docker
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-dotnet-CQRS/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Create sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml #39

Closed guibranco closed 3 months ago

guibranco commented 3 months ago

Resolves #ISSUE_NUMBER


Before the change?

After the change?

Pull request checklist

Does this introduce a breaking change?


Summary by CodeRabbit

Description by Korbit AI

[!NOTE] This feature is in early access. You can enable or disable it in the Korbit Console.

What change is being made?

Add a GitHub Actions workflow file sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml to upload SonarCloud analysis results to Pixeebot.

Why are these changes being made?

This change automates the process of uploading SonarCloud code analysis results to Pixeebot, ensuring that code quality issues are tracked and managed efficiently. This approach leverages GitHub Actions to streamline the integration and maintain code quality standards.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.github/workflows/sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml - The permissions field is not a valid field in GitHub Actions workflow configurations. This may cause unexpected behavior or errors during execution.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.github/workflows/sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml - Consider removing the permissions section as it is not a recognized key in GitHub Actions workflows and may not serve a valid purpose in this context.
  2. /.github/workflows/sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml - Make sure to thoroughly test the workflow to ensure that the condition in the if statement under jobs.share works as expected and accurately filters when to execute the job based on the check_run event name.
coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

[!CAUTION]

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The new GitHub Actions workflow, .github/workflows/sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml, integrates SonarCloud analysis into the Pixeebot project. It triggers upon the completion of the SonarCloud Code Analysis check and uploads the results securely, enhancing automated quality checks in the CI/CD pipeline. This addition streamlines processes, ensuring timely feedback on code quality and maintaining high standards in development.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml Introduced a new workflow to upload SonarCloud analysis results, running conditionally on specific check run completions.

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where code does bloom,
A new workflow chases away the gloom.
With Sonar's light, we’ll analyze,
Quality checks are now a prize!
Pixeebot hops, with results to share,
In our CI/CD, we show we care! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
instapr[bot] commented 3 months ago

Comment:

codeclimate[bot] commented 3 months ago

Code Climate has analyzed commit f655ce8b and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 months ago

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issue Counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Summary of Proposed Changes

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 💪Best Practices Missing pull_request trigger to ensure the workflow runs on PRs as well. 🟠Medium 🟠Medium
2 💪Best Practices Missing push trigger to ensure the workflow runs on direct pushes to the main branch. 🟠Medium 🟠Medium

Issue 1: Missing pull_request Trigger

Details: The workflow is currently configured to trigger only on completed check runs. It is a best practice to also include pull_request triggers to ensure the workflow runs on PRs as well.

File Path: .github/workflows/sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml

Lines of Code:

on:
  check_run:
    types: [completed]

Fix:

on:
  check_run:
    types: [completed]
  pull_request:
    branches:
      - main

Explanation: Adding the pull_request trigger ensures that the workflow runs when a PR is created or updated, providing continuous feedback on code quality.

Issue 2: Missing push Trigger

Details: The workflow is currently configured to trigger only on completed check runs. It is a best practice to also include push triggers to ensure the workflow runs on direct pushes to the main branch.

File Path: .github/workflows/sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml

Lines of Code:

on:
  check_run:
    types: [completed]

Fix:

on:
  check_run:
    types: [completed]
  push:
    branches:
      - main

Explanation: Adding the push trigger ensures that the workflow runs when code is directly pushed to the main branch, maintaining code quality.

General Review

The proposed changes introduce a new GitHub Actions workflow to upload SonarCloud results using Pixeebot. The code is well-structured and follows standard practices for GitHub Actions. However, it is recommended to add pull_request and push triggers to ensure the workflow runs on PRs and direct pushes to the main branch, respectively. This will provide continuous feedback on code quality and maintain the integrity of the main branch.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know your feedback!

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

3:33PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
3:33PM INF 37 commits scanned.
3:33PM INF scan completed in 65.7ms
3:33PM INF no leaks found
korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.