search

GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-EventStoreDb

🔬 Proof of Concept of EventStoreDb with .NET
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-EventStoreDb-dotnet/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Bump guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.620 to 2.2.637 #12

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 2 months ago

dependabot[bot] commented 3 months ago

Bumps guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.620 to 2.2.637.

Release notes

Sourced from guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2's releases.

Release v2.2.637

Release 2.2.637 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.2.634...v2.2.637

Release v2.2.634

Release 2.2.634 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.2.629...v2.2.634

Release v2.2.629

Release 2.2.629 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.2.620...v2.2.629

Commits


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.

Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Description by Korbit AI

[!NOTE] This feature is in early access. You can enable or disable it in the Korbit Console.

Bump guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.620 to 2.2.637

This change updates the guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 GitHub Action from version 2.2.620 to 2.2.637 in the .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml file.

The update ensures compatibility with the latest features and bug fixes provided in the newer version of the action. This helps maintain the stability and security of the workflow.

Summary by CodeRabbit

dependabot[bot] commented 3 months ago

The following labels could not be found: github-actions, dependencies.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • It seems like the version of the github-file-reader-action-v2 has been updated from v2.2.620 to v2.2.637 in both steps. Ensure compatibility and test thoroughly with this new version to prevent any unexpected issues.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • Consider adding a descriptive comment above each step to explain its purpose briefly, enhancing code readability for maintainability.
    • Evaluate if the if: always() condition used in the first step of reading secrets-result.log is necessary and provides value. Remove it if not needed for clarity.
    • Ensure consistent formatting across the workflow file, such as maintaining alignment and spacing for a cleaner and more organized structure.
senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 3 months ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. :tada: To get the most out of Senior Dev, please sign up in our Web App, connect your GitHub account, and add/join your organization GuilhermeStracini. After that, you will receive code reviews beginning on your next opened PR. :rocket:

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 months ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the proposed changes. The version bump appears to be straightforward and does not introduce any new code or logic that could potentially cause issues.

Missing Tests

No new tests are required for this change as it is a version bump of a GitHub Action, and does not introduce new functionality or alter existing logic.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to share your feedback with me!

instapr[bot] commented 3 months ago

Feedback

These changes look good!

deepsource-io[bot] commented 3 months ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits c09a825..54e7e58. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource C# LogoC#✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage✅ SuccessView Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregateC#
Branch Coverage100%100%
Composite Coverage0%0%
Line Coverage0%0%
💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
guibranco commented 3 months ago

@dependabot squash and merge

coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

Walkthrough

The update involves changing the version of the github-file-reader-action in a GitHub Actions workflow file from v2.2.620 to v2.2.637. This change affects two instances in the workflow, potentially bringing improvements or bug fixes to the file reading functionality. Overall, it's a maintenance update aimed at enhancing the reliability of the workflow.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml Updated github-file-reader-action from v2.2.620 to v2.2.637 for reading secrets logs.

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, I hop and play,
With updates so bright, they brighten the day.
A version now newer, with fixes galore,
I’ll read all the secrets, and then read some more!
So let’s all rejoice, for changes in flight,
A leap towards better, oh what a delight! 🌼

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
sonarcloud[bot] commented 3 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

3:17AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
3:17AM INF 8 commits scanned.
3:17AM INF scan completed in 62ms
3:17AM INF no leaks found
dependabot[bot] commented 3 months ago

One of your CI runs failed on this pull request, so Dependabot won't merge it.

Dependabot will still automatically merge this pull request if you amend it and your tests pass.