GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-EventStoreDb

🔬 Proof of Concept of EventStoreDb with .NET
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-EventStoreDb-dotnet/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Rename projeect #16

Closed guibranco closed 1 month ago

guibranco commented 1 month ago

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Rename the project from "POCTemplate" to "POCEventStoreDb" across the entire codebase.

Why are these changes being made?

The project name is being updated to better reflect its purpose and functionality, which is to serve as a proof of concept for EventStoreDB integration in a .NET application. This change improves clarity and alignment with the project's objectives.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 1 month ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Analyzed 2 of 6 files.

Filename Status
:grey_question: .wakatime-project Unsupported file format
:grey_question: POCEventStoreDb.sln Unsupported file format
:grey_question: Tests/POCEventStoreDb.Tests/POCEventStoreDb.Tests.csproj Unsupported file format
:heavy_check_mark: Tests/POCEventStoreDb.Tests/UnitTest1.cs Analyzed
:grey_question: Src/POCEventStoreDb/POCEventStoreDb.csproj Unsupported file format
:heavy_check_mark: Src/POCEventStoreDb/Program.cs Analyzed
senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

korbit-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

instapr[bot] commented 1 month ago

Feedback

Overall, the changes seem accurate. Great job!

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 1 month ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 1 month ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. Program.cs and UnitTest1.cs files were updated to change the namespace from POCTemplate to POCEventStoreDb, but the namespace is incorrectly updated in the Program.cs file as namespace POCEventStoreDb;. It should be namespace POCEventStoreDb without the semicolon at the end, as namespaces don't have semicolons.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. Ensure consistent naming convention is followed for the solution and project files to maintain clarity and uniformity.
  2. When renaming files and namespaces, ensure to update all references and occurrences to avoid inconsistencies and potential errors in the future.
  3. Double-check all changes to make sure that the modifications are accurate. In this case, ensuring that the namespace changes are correctly formatted is crucial for the code's correctness and maintainability.
coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@korbit-ai[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue? After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
How do rate limits work? CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.
Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9002c847e033fdca0695e4028d83bdbd56d033db and 0fcfd89a1cc9a5afb831839bd2f4c2b5e5490969.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
gooroo-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 🤪Typo Typo in the pull request title: "Rename projeect" should be "Rename project" 🟡Low 🟡Low

Issue Explanations and Fixes

ID 1: Typo in the pull request title

Issue: There is a typo in the pull request title. "projeect" should be corrected to "project".

Fix: Correct the title of the pull request to "Rename project".

Explanation: Correcting the typo in the title improves clarity and professionalism.

Missing Tests

No new functionality or logic changes were introduced in this pull request. The changes are limited to renaming namespaces and files. Therefore, no additional tests are required.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Feel free to react or reply to this review!

deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 month ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 9002c84..0fcfd89. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage⚠️ Artifact not reportedTimed out: Artifact was never reportedView Check ↗
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource C# LogoC#✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

5:49PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
5:49PM INF 10 commits scanned.
5:49PM INF scan completed in 63.6ms
5:49PM INF no leaks found
sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 month ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud