search

GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-EventStoreDb

🔬 Proof of Concept of EventStoreDb with .NET
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-EventStoreDb-dotnet/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Update README.md #3

Closed guibranco closed 3 months ago

guibranco commented 3 months ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. README.md: The title in the file has been changed from "PoC .NET template" to "PoC EventStoreDb with .NET," but the emoji added may not be universally supported or appropriate for a README file.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. README.md: Consider using a more standard format for README titles without emojis unless they serve a specific purpose related to the content. Emojis may not render consistently in all environments.
  2. README.md: When providing useful links, consider making them clickable by using markdown syntax Link Text for better readability and usability.
pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

instapr[bot] commented 3 months ago 
### Feedback:
- Updated title in README.md ✅
- Added useful links section 🔗
coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

Walkthrough

The repository has shifted its focus from being a general .NET Proof of Concept (PoC) template to specifically implementing PoC using EventStoreDb with .NET. The README.md file was updated to reflect this new direction and now includes a link to a Medium article detailing CRUD operations using EventStoreDb in .NET.

Changes

Files Change Summary
README.md Updated content to focus on EventStoreDb with .NET. Added a link to a Medium article detailing CRUD operations.

Poem

In the realm of .NET, we took a new flight,
Embracing EventStoreDb, feels oh so right.
CRUD operations now clear in sight,
With a README refreshed, shining bright.
🚀 .NET's journey, scaling new height! 🌟

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 months ago

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issue Counts Table

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Summary of Proposed Changes

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the proposed changes.

General Review

The proposed changes are straightforward and improve the specificity of the README file by focusing on EventStoreDb with .NET. The addition of a useful link is beneficial for users looking for more information on CRUD operations with EventStoreDb in .NET. The removal of the template-specific instructions is appropriate given the new focus of the repository. Overall, the changes enhance the clarity and usefulness of the README file.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Please add a reaction or reply to share your thoughts.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!

Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

12:01AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:01AM INF 2 commits scanned.
12:01AM INF scan completed in 62.6ms
12:01AM INF no leaks found