Bump csharpier from 0.29.1 to 0.29.2

dependabot[bot] commented 4 days ago

Bumps csharpier from 0.29.1 to 0.29.2.

Release notes

0.29.2 What's Changed

Comments don't follow tabs indent style #1343

Prior to 0.29.2 CSharpier was converting any tabs within the block of a multiline comment to spaces.

public void SomeFunction()
{
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
        This line is indented by one tab. (prior to 0.29.2 this would end up as a tab followed by 4 spaces)
    */
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
        This line is indented by 4 spaces but will be converted to 1 tab (prior to 0.29.2 this would end up as a tab followed by 4 spaces)
    */
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
       This line is indented by 3 spaces but will be left as 3 spaces
    */
}

`csharpier-ignore-start` now supported in object initializers #1342

// input & expected output
return new SomeClass
{
    // csharpier-ignore-start
    SomeProperty =     someValue,
    SomeProperty2 =     someValue
    // csharpier-ignore-end
};
// 0.29.1

return new SomeClass

{

// csharpier-ignore-start

SomeProperty = someValue,

SomeProperty2 = someValue

// csharpier-ignore-end

};

Fixed extra new line between cast and collection expression. #1334

// input & expected output
CallMethod(
    (string[])
        [
            longerValue_____________________________________________,
            longerValue_____________________________________________,
</tr></table>

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from csharpier's changelog.

# 0.29.2

What's Changed

Comments don't follow tabs indent style #1343

Prior to 0.29.2 CSharpier was converting any tabs within the block of a multiline comment to spaces.

public void SomeFunction()
{
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
        This line is indented by one tab. (prior to 0.29.2 this would end up as a tab followed by 4 spaces)
    */
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
        This line is indented by 4 spaces but will be converted to 1 tab (prior to 0.29.2 this would end up as a tab followed by 4 spaces)
    */
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
       This line is indented by 3 spaces but will be left as 3 spaces
    */
}

`csharpier-ignore-start` now supported in object initializers #1342

// input & expected output
return new SomeClass
{
    // csharpier-ignore-start
    SomeProperty =     someValue,
    SomeProperty2 =     someValue
    // csharpier-ignore-end
};
// 0.29.1

return new SomeClass

{

// csharpier-ignore-start

SomeProperty = someValue,

SomeProperty2 = someValue

// csharpier-ignore-end

};

Fixed extra new line between cast and collection expression. #1334

// input & expected output
CallMethod(
    (string[])
        [
            longerValue_____________________________________________,
            longerValue_____________________________________________,
</tr></table>

... (truncated)

Commits

57c3ca1 Releasing 0.29.2 (#1347)
861f281 Support custom file extensions with editor config (#1346)
e90022e fixing issue when formatting with tabs that would convert tabs in com… (#1344)
3fd7faa Adding support for csharpier-ignore-start in object initializers (#1345)
8bca3ce fixing issue with extra line before collection expression within a ca… (#1335)
4d51407 Tweak the logic around validating installs so it doesn't bomb out and… (#1339)
12fb058 Possible fix for issue on osx (#1338)
90c6c28 proper indent size
See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

dependabot[bot] commented 4 days ago

The following labels could not be found: nuget, .NET, packages, dependencies.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 4 days ago

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 4 days ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 4 days ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Analyzed 1 of 1 files.

	Filename	Status
:heavy_check_mark:	.config/dotnet-tools.json	Analyzed

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 4 days ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Changes in the diff

🛠️ Bumped the version of csharpier from 0.29.1 to 0.29.2.

Identified Issues

No issues were found in the proposed changes. The version bump appears straightforward and does not introduce any new code or features that could be problematic.

Missing Tests

No new tests are needed for this change as it is simply a version bump for a tool dependency.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to share your feedback with me!

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 4 days ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 4 days ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

/.config/dotnet-tools.json: Updating the version of the tool csharpier (from "0.29.1" to "0.29.2") can potentially introduce new bugs, functionality changes, or compatibility issues that were not present in the previous version. It is advisable to thoroughly test the new version after the update.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

/.config/dotnet-tools.json: When updating dependencies or tools like csharpier, it's a good practice to check the release notes or changelog of the new version to understand any breaking changes, new features, bug fixes, or improvements introduced in the tool. This can help in assessing the impact of the update on the project.

instapr[bot] commented 4 days ago

Feedback

The bump from csharpier 0.29.1 to 0.29.2 looks good.
No changes needed, everything seems fine.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 4 days ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: -- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` -- `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` -- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` -- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` -- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` -- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

deepsource-io[bot] commented 4 days ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits b579b16..8bd029b. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Test coverage	⚠️ Artifact not reported	Timed out: Artifact was never reported	View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success		View Check ↗
C#	✅ Success		View Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

guibranco commented 4 days ago

@dependabot squash and merge

sonarcloud[bot] commented 4 days ago

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

github-actions[bot] commented 4 days ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

2:18AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
2:18AM INF 21 commits scanned.
2:18AM INF scan completed in 64.6ms
2:18AM INF no leaks found

dependabot[bot] commented 4 days ago

One of your CI runs failed on this pull request, so Dependabot won't merge it.

Dependabot will still automatically merge this pull request if you amend it and your tests pass.

GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-EventStoreDb