GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-EventStoreDb

🔬 Proof of Concept of EventStoreDb with .NET
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-EventStoreDb-dotnet/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Rename _cofing.yml to _config.yml #4

Closed guibranco closed 2 months ago

guibranco commented 2 months ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 2 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 2 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

instapr[bot] commented 2 months ago
Needs to rename file _cofing.yml to _config.yml
codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 2 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. _config.yml: There is no actual change in the shown diff. The line '+show_downloads: true' is repeated and redundant. This can potentially cause confusion or indicate that the configuration was updated when it was not.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. _config.yml: It would be beneficial to provide a meaningful and explanatory comment or description for the 'show_downloads' setting to improve readability and understanding of its purpose.
pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 2 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 months ago

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue? After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
How do rate limits work? CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.
Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd06ce158e2725276c8e9155f4d760f43277ee17 and 4ddef0f9e4230ecc241b8f76c499a8fb5d678eef.

Walkthrough

The change involves a simple modification in the _config.yml file where the show_downloads setting remains set to true. There are no other changes in the configuration or any impact on the declarations of exported or public entities.

Changes

Files Change Summary
_config.yml No modifications to show_downloads, value remains true

Poem

Amidst the lines of YAML, A setting stayed the same, Downloads still on display, Unchanged, it keeps its name. 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
deepsource-io[bot] commented 2 months ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits bd06ce1..4ddef0f. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource C# LogoC#✅ SuccessView Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregateC#
Branch Coverage100%100%
Composite Coverage0%0%
Line Coverage0%0%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
gooroo-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issues Table

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Summary of Proposed Changes

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 📖Readability Missing newline at the end of the file _config.yml 🟡Low 🟠Medium
2 ❓Others No significant changes in the content of the file, only renaming 🟡Low 🟠Medium

Issue Explanations and Fixes

Issue 1: Missing newline at the end of the file _config.yml

Details:
The file _config.yml is missing a newline at the end of the file. This is a minor readability issue and can be considered a best practice to include a newline at the end of files.

Fix:

@@ -4,4 +4,4 @@ theme: jekyll-theme-cayman
 title: PoC .NET - template
 description: 🔬 Proof of Concept template repository for .NET
-show_downloads: true
\ No newline at end of file
+show_downloads: true

Explanation:
Adding a newline at the end of the file improves readability and adheres to best coding practices.

Issue 2: No significant changes in the content of the file, only renaming

Details:
The proposed changes only include renaming the file from _cofing.yml to _config.yml and adding a newline at the end of the file. There are no significant content changes in the file.

Fix:
No code changes required.

Explanation:
This is just an observation that the content of the file remains unchanged, and the primary change is the correction of the filename.

General Review

The proposed changes are straightforward and primarily involve correcting a typo in the filename. The addition of a newline at the end of the file is a good practice for readability. There are no significant content changes or issues related to security, performance, or best practices. The code quality and style are acceptable.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev I'd love to hear your feedback! Add a reaction or reply.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 2 months ago

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

12:05AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:05AM INF 3 commits scanned.
12:05AM INF scan completed in 64.4ms
12:05AM INF no leaks found