Create sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml

guibranco commented 3 months ago

Description by Korbit AI

[!NOTE] This feature is in early access. You can enable or disable it in the Korbit Console.

What change is being made?

Add a GitHub Actions workflow file sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml to upload SonarCloud analysis results to Pixeebot.

Why are these changes being made?

This change automates the process of uploading SonarCloud code analysis results to Pixeebot, ensuring that code quality issues are tracked and managed efficiently. This approach leverages GitHub Actions for seamless integration and automation.

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for automating the upload of SonarCloud analysis results for the Pixeebot project.
- The workflow enhances code quality checks by integrating SonarCloud results seamlessly into the CI/CD pipeline.
Bug Fixes
- Addressed issues identified by SonarCloud, improving overall project maintainability and code quality.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

/.github/workflows/sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml - The permissions key is not valid in GitHub Actions workflow files and may cause a syntax error.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

/.github/workflows/sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml - Add a description explaining the purpose of the workflow for better clarity and documentation.
/.github/workflows/sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml - Consider adding error handling and fallback mechanisms in case the SonarCloud Code Analysis check is not present to prevent unexpected workflow failures.

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

instapr[bot] commented 3 months ago

Feedback:

Ensure to remove unnecessary or unrelated details in the patch file.
Consider adding more descriptive information to the PR body for clearer context.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

[!CAUTION]

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for the Pixeebot project that integrates SonarCloud analysis into the CI/CD pipeline. Triggered by the successful completion of a SonarCloud check run, this workflow automates the upload of analysis results. This enhancement streamlines quality checks, improving code quality management and fostering a more robust development process.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
`.github/workflows/sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml`	Added a new workflow for SonarCloud integration to enhance code quality.

Poem

🐇 In the meadow of code, we hop with delight,
A workflow emerges, shining so bright.
With Sonar's keen eye, our bugs will take flight,
Quality blossoms, all errors in sight!
Let’s dance with our changes, a joyous new tune,
For Pixeebot’s future, we’ll reach for the moon! 🌙

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 3 months ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

deepsource-io[bot] commented 3 months ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits b72ac8a..c8f676c. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Link
Test coverage	✅ Success	View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success	View Check ↗
C#	✅ Success	View Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

Metric	Aggregate	C#
Branch Coverage	100%	100%
Composite Coverage	0%	0%
Line Coverage	0%	0%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 months ago

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issue Counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Summary of Proposed Changes

🛠️ Created a new GitHub Actions workflow file named sonarcloud-pixeebot.yml.
🛠️ Configured the workflow to trigger on the completion of a check run.
🛠️ Set permissions to write id-token.
🛠️ Defined a job named Upload Sonar Results to Pixeebot that runs on ubuntu-latest.
🛠️ Included a condition to run the job only if the check run name is SonarCloud Code Analysis.
🛠️ Added a step to use the pixee/upload-tool-results-action@v2 action to upload Sonar results.
🛠️ Passed the sonar-token secret to the action.

Identified Issues

No issues were found in the proposed changes.

General Review

The code quality and style are good. The workflow is well-structured and follows best practices for GitHub Actions. The use of secrets for sensitive data is appropriate. No significant issues were identified.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev I'd appreciate it if you could react or reply!

sonarcloud[bot] commented 3 months ago

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

10:33AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:33AM INF 4 commits scanned.
10:33AM INF scan completed in 62.9ms
10:33AM INF no leaks found

GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-EventStoreDb