search

GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-template

🔬 Proof of Concept template repository for .NET
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-dotnet-template/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Bump guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.647 to 2.2.657 #19

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 2 months ago

dependabot[bot] commented 2 months ago

Bumps guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.647 to 2.2.657.

Release notes

Sourced from guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2's releases.

Release v2.2.657

Release 2.2.657 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.2.651...v2.2.657

Release v2.2.651

Release 2.2.651 of GitHub Actions File Reader V2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.2.647...v2.2.651

Commits


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.

Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Bump guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.647 to 2.2.657 in the .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml file.

Why are these changes being made?

This update includes bug fixes and performance improvements in the github-file-reader-action-v2 action, ensuring better stability and efficiency in reading log and report files during the secrets check workflow.

dependabot[bot] commented 2 months ago

The following labels could not be found: github-actions, dependencies.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 2 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 2 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the incoming changes. The version bump appears to be straightforward and does not introduce any new code or logic that could potentially cause problems.

Missing Tests

No tests are required for this change as it is a version bump for a GitHub Action, which does not involve any new functionality or logic changes that need to be tested.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Feel free to react or reply with your feedback!

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 2 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 2 months ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 2 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • It seems that the workflow file uses the same version v2.2.657 for two different actions (github-file-reader-action-v2). While this may not always lead to a problem, it can introduce inconsistency if different functionality or behaviors are expected between the two actions. It's advisable to ensure that the versions match only if the actions provide the same features.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • Consider adding comments on each step to explain the purpose of reading secrets-result.log and secrets-result.md. This will help improve the readability and maintainability of the workflow.
    • It might be beneficial to have a consistent condition for deciding which version of the action to use (v2.2.657). Currently, it seems to be based on the outcome (success or failure), but it could be clearer if the rationale for this differentiation is documented in a comment.
    • If the different versions of the action indeed serve distinct purposes based on success and failure, it would be helpful to document this behavior to prevent misunderstandings or accidental changes in the future.
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 months ago

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@korbit-ai[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue? After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
How do rate limits work? CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.
Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a84f7b3ddd5081387186f326face3414715f31f and 30f29f818634f2d0ca453159540fcdd1d272f1ea.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
instapr[bot] commented 2 months ago

Feedback

The dependency guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 has been successfully updated from version 2.2.647 to 2.2.657. No issues found.

Make sure to test the changes thoroughly to ensure everything is functioning as expected with the updated dependency.

deepsource-io[bot] commented 2 months ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 5a84f7b..30f29f8. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource C# LogoC#✅ SuccessView Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregateC#
Branch Coverage100%100%
Composite Coverage0%0%
Line Coverage0%0%
💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
guibranco commented 2 months ago

@dependabot squash and merge

sonarcloud[bot] commented 2 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

5:22PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
5:22PM INF 14 commits scanned.
5:22PM INF scan completed in 65.4ms
5:22PM INF no leaks found