search

GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-template

🔬 Proof of Concept template repository for .NET
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-dotnet-template/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Update install.ps1 #20

Closed guibranco closed 2 months ago

guibranco commented 2 months ago

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Update install.ps1 to differentiate between POC name for file naming and a readable version for content replacement.

Why are these changes being made?

This change ensures that the POC name used in file names can be different from the readable version used within file contents, improving clarity and flexibility in naming conventions.

Summary by CodeRabbit

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 2 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 2 months ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

korbit-ai[bot] commented 2 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 2 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 months ago

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@korbit-ai[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue? After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
How do rate limits work? CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.
Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff894af1216071f39f2064ea165f95ca445b55e9 and 0db867a69378cbf7e271a65a2b8aee46ebe899c0.

Walkthrough

The install.ps1 script has been updated to clarify the distinction between the file name and its readable version for the POC name. A new variable captures the readable version, ensuring it is used consistently across modified files. This enhances usability and improves documentation clarity.

Changes

Files Change Summary
install.ps1 Changed prompt for $POCName to clarify it as the file name; added $POCNameReadable for the readable version.
README.md, .wakatime-project, _config.yml Replaced occurrences of "POCTemplate" with the new $POCNameReadable variable for consistency in documentation.

Possibly related issues

🐇 In the garden, where ideas bloom,
A script emerges, dispelling gloom.
With names now clear, confusion takes flight,
A readable POC, shining so bright!
Hopping along, we code with delight! 🌼✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
instapr[bot] commented 2 months ago 
This looks good overall. It seems like a valid update to ```install.ps1```. Just a minor suggestion: consider replacing "$POCNameReadable" with "$POCName".
codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 2 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. Read-Host command is used to read user input without any validation or error handling, which can lead to unexpected input causing issues in the script execution.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. Filepath Handling:
    • It's advisable to validate the file paths like $MainProjectFile, $UnitTestProjectFile, $MainDir, $UnitTestDir, etc., to ensure they are valid paths before performing operations on them.
  2. Input Validation:
    • Add input validation to ensure that the user inputs are within the expected format and range to avoid potential issues.
  3. Consistent Naming:
    • Using consistent naming conventions throughout the script would improve readability and maintainability.
  4. Error Handling:
    • Implement error handling mechanisms, such as try-catch blocks, to capture and handle any errors that may occur during file operations or command executions.
  5. User Prompt Clarity:
    • Provide clear and specific prompts to users to improve understanding and input accuracy. For example, the prompt "POC name (file name)" can be further clarified for better user input.
  6. Ensure Readability:
    • Ensure the script remains readable by using descriptive variable names and comments where necessary.
  7. Removing Files:
    • Consider adding confirmation or checks before removing files like install.bat, install.ps1, and install.sh to prevent accidental deletion.
deepsource-io[bot] commented 2 months ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits ff894af..0db867a. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource C# LogoC#✅ SuccessView Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregateC#
Branch Coverage100%100%
Composite Coverage0%0%
Line Coverage0%0%
💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
gooroo-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Changes in the diff

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 💪Best Practices Missing newline at the end of the file install.ps1 🟡Low 🟡Low
2 ❓Others Potentially confusing variable names $POCName and $POCNameReadable 🟠Medium 🟠Medium

Issue 1: Missing newline at the end of the file install.ps1

Explanation

The file install.ps1 is missing a newline at the end of the file. This is a minor issue but is considered a best practice to include a newline at the end of files.

Code to Address the Issue

Remove-Item install.sh
+

Explanation of the Fix

Adding a newline at the end of the file ensures that the file adheres to best practices and avoids potential issues with certain tools and systems that expect files to end with a newline.

Issue 2: Potentially confusing variable names $POCName and $POCNameReadable

Explanation

The variable names $POCName and $POCNameReadable could be confusing to developers as they might not immediately understand the difference between the two. It is a good practice to use clear and descriptive variable names.

Code to Address the Issue

-$POCName = Read-Host -Prompt 'POC name (file name)'
-$POCNameReadable = Read-Host -Prompt 'POC name (readable version)'
+$POCFileName = Read-Host -Prompt 'POC name (file name)'
+$POCDisplayName = Read-Host -Prompt 'POC name (readable version)'

Explanation of the Fix

Renaming $POCName to $POCFileName and $POCNameReadable to $POCDisplayName makes it clearer that one is intended for file naming and the other for display purposes.

Missing Tests for the Incoming Changes

Given the nature of the changes (modifications to a script), unit tests are not applicable. However, it is important to manually verify the following:

  1. The script correctly prompts for both the file name and readable name.
  2. The replacements in README.md, .wakatime-project, and _config.yml are accurate.
  3. The script correctly renames directories and removes installation files as intended.

Manual testing steps:

  1. Run the script and provide test inputs for both prompts.
  2. Verify that the replacements in the specified files are correct.
  3. Ensure that the directories are renamed and the installation files are removed.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know your thoughts!

sonarcloud[bot] commented 2 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

5:48PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
5:48PM INF 15 commits scanned.
5:48PM INF scan completed in 63.7ms
5:48PM INF no leaks found