GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-template

🔬 Proof of Concept template repository for .NET
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-dotnet-template/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Add basic project structure #3

Closed guibranco closed 3 months ago

guibranco commented 3 months ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Analyzed 3 of 17 files.

Filename Status
:grey_question: .csharpierrc.yaml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .deepsource.toml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .wakatime-project Unsupported file format
:grey_question: POCTemplate.sln Unsupported file format
:grey_question: _cofing.yml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/POCTemplate.Tests.csproj Unsupported file format
:heavy_check_mark: Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/UnitTest1.cs Analyzed
:grey_question: Src/POCTemplate/POCTemplate.csproj Unsupported file format
:heavy_check_mark: Src/POCTemplate/Program.cs Analyzed
:grey_question: .github/dependabot.yml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .github/workflows/build.yml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .github/workflows/deep-source.yml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .github/workflows/linter.yml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .github/workflows/size-label.yml Unsupported file format
:grey_question: .githooks/pre-commit Unsupported file format
:heavy_check_mark: .config/dotnet-tools.json Analyzed
korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.githooks/pre-commit
    • The check for a valid branch name regex pattern does not allow branch names starting with one of the valid prefixes, potentially causing rejects on acceptable branch names.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.githooks/pre-commit

    • Update the valid_branch_regex pattern to allow branch names to start with the specified prefixes by modifying the pattern to: ^(dependabot|feature|fix|docs|style|refactor|perf|hotfix|test|chore|create)\/[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+$.
  2. /.github/dependabot.yml

    • Add error handling in case the assignment of assignees or reviewers fails.
  3. /.github/workflows/deep-source.yml

    • Consider adding error handling for each step in the job to properly handle potential failures and improve the reliability of the workflow.
  4. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml

    • Ensure that output files are properly handled by checking file existence before processing them.
    • Improve error handling and messages to provide more informative feedback in case of failures.
  5. /.wakatime-project

    • Add a newline at the end of the file to adhere to common file-ending conventions.
  6. /POCTemplate.sln

    • Review and ensure consistency in the file header and formatting.
  7. /Src/POCTemplate/Program.cs

    • Consider adding more meaningful comments within the main entry point function to provide clarity on the application's purpose.
  8. /Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/UnitTest1.cs

    • Validate the unit test content to ensure its adequacy for testing the intended functionality.
  9. /_cofing.yml

    • Correct the filename typo from _cofing.yml to _config.yml for proper configuration file usage.
coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

Walkthrough

This update introduces several configurations and tooling enhancements to bolster the development and CI/CD process for a .NET project. Key additions include configuration files for code formatting with csharpier, code analysis with DeepSource, and automated workflows for building, testing, and maintaining code quality. New pre-commit hooks ensure coding standards, while the project structure now supports a .NET solution with a sample application and test project.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summary
.config/dotnet-tools.json Added csharpier tool configuration.
.csharpierrc.yaml Added csharpier configuration for end-of-line settings.
.deepsource.toml Added DeepSource analysis configuration.
.githooks/pre-commit Added pre-commit hook for branch naming and code formatting.
.github/dependabot.yml Added Dependabot configuration for dependency updates.
.github/workflows/build.yml Added GitHub Actions workflow for building and testing the solution.
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml Added GitHub Actions workflow for DeepSource analysis.
.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml Added GitHub Actions workflow for secrets checking.
.github/workflows/linter.yml Added GitHub Actions workflow for code formatting validation.
.github/workflows/size-label.yml Added GitHub Actions workflow for PR size labeling.
.wakatime-project Added Wakatime project configuration for a POC .NET template.
POCTemplate.sln Added Visual Studio solution file with project references.
Src/POCTemplate/POCTemplate.csproj Added .NET project file targeting net8.0.
Src/POCTemplate/Program.cs Added a simple "Hello, World!" program file.
Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/POCTemplate.Tests.csproj Added test project configuration with references.
Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/UnitTest1.cs Added a unit test class with a sample test method.
_config.yml Added Jekyll theme metadata for the POC template repository.

Poem

In a meadow of code so bright, Tools and scripts bring pure delight, A pre-commit that's strong and clear, csharpier keeps the format near. DeepSource checks with eagle's eye, Dependabot updates flying high. Build, test, and scan with ease, Our .NET project sails the breeze. 🌼🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
instapr[bot] commented 3 months ago

Feedback

Once these points are addressed, the PR should be in good shape!

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 months ago

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 1 0 0 0 1 0

Summary of Proposed Changes

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 🤪Typo Typo in filename _cofing.yml, should be _config.yml. 🟡Low 🔴High
2 📖Readability Missing newline at end of file .config/dotnet-tools.json. 🟡Low 🔴High

Issue 1: Typo in filename _cofing.yml

Fix: Rename the file _cofing.yml to _config.yml.

git mv _cofing.yml _config.yml

Issue 2: Missing newline at end of file .config/dotnet-tools.json

Fix: Add a newline at the end of the file .config/dotnet-tools.json.

diff --git a/.config/dotnet-tools.json b/.config/dotnet-tools.json
index b0f5df2..e69de29 100644
--- a/.config/dotnet-tools.json
+++ b/.config/dotnet-tools.json
@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@
       }
     }
   }
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}

General Review

The proposed changes establish a basic project structure with essential configurations for tools, workflows, and dependencies. The code quality is generally good, but there are minor issues such as a typo in the filename and a missing newline at the end of a file. Addressing these issues will improve the overall quality and maintainability of the project.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Please add a reaction or reply to share your thoughts!

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

11:35PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:35PM INF 6 commits scanned.
11:35PM INF scan completed in 62.9ms
11:35PM INF no leaks found
korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

I have reviewed your code and found 4 potential issues. To discuss my individual comments that I have added, tag me in replies using @korbit-ai.


Please react with a 👍 to my comments that you find helpful and a 👎 to those you find unhelpful - this will help me learn and improve as we collaborate.