GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-template

🔬 Proof of Concept template repository for .NET
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-dotnet-template/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Bump csharpier from 0.29.1 to 0.29.2 #35

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 1 month ago

dependabot[bot] commented 1 month ago

Bumps csharpier from 0.29.1 to 0.29.2.

Release notes

Sourced from csharpier's releases.

0.29.2

What's Changed

Comments don't follow tabs indent style #1343

Prior to 0.29.2 CSharpier was converting any tabs within the block of a multiline comment to spaces.

public void SomeFunction()
{
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
        This line is indented by one tab. (prior to 0.29.2 this would end up as a tab followed by 4 spaces)
    */
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
        This line is indented by 4 spaces but will be converted to 1 tab (prior to 0.29.2 this would end up as a tab followed by 4 spaces)
    */
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
       This line is indented by 3 spaces but will be left as 3 spaces
    */
}

csharpier-ignore-start now supported in object initializers #1342

// input & expected output
return new SomeClass
{
    // csharpier-ignore-start
    SomeProperty =     someValue,
    SomeProperty2 =     someValue
    // csharpier-ignore-end
};

// 0.29.1
return new SomeClass
{
// csharpier-ignore-start
SomeProperty = someValue,
SomeProperty2 = someValue
// csharpier-ignore-end
};

Fixed extra new line between cast and collection expression. #1334

// input & expected output
CallMethod(
    (string[])
        [
            longerValue_____________________________________________,
            longerValue_____________________________________________,
</tr></table> 

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from csharpier's changelog.

# 0.29.2

What's Changed

Comments don't follow tabs indent style #1343

Prior to 0.29.2 CSharpier was converting any tabs within the block of a multiline comment to spaces.

public void SomeFunction()
{
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
        This line is indented by one tab. (prior to 0.29.2 this would end up as a tab followed by 4 spaces)
    */
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
        This line is indented by 4 spaces but will be converted to 1 tab (prior to 0.29.2 this would end up as a tab followed by 4 spaces)
    */
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
       This line is indented by 3 spaces but will be left as 3 spaces
    */
}

csharpier-ignore-start now supported in object initializers #1342

// input & expected output
return new SomeClass
{
    // csharpier-ignore-start
    SomeProperty =     someValue,
    SomeProperty2 =     someValue
    // csharpier-ignore-end
};

// 0.29.1
return new SomeClass
{
// csharpier-ignore-start
SomeProperty = someValue,
SomeProperty2 = someValue
// csharpier-ignore-end
};

Fixed extra new line between cast and collection expression. #1334

// input & expected output
CallMethod(
    (string[])
        [
            longerValue_____________________________________________,
            longerValue_____________________________________________,
</tr></table> 

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 57c3ca1 Releasing 0.29.2 (#1347)
  • 861f281 Support custom file extensions with editor config (#1346)
  • e90022e fixing issue when formatting with tabs that would convert tabs in com… (#1344)
  • 3fd7faa Adding support for csharpier-ignore-start in object initializers (#1345)
  • 8bca3ce fixing issue with extra line before collection expression within a ca… (#1335)
  • 4d51407 Tweak the logic around validating installs so it doesn't bomb out and… (#1339)
  • 12fb058 Possible fix for issue on osx (#1338)
  • 90c6c28 proper indent size
  • See full diff in compare view


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
dependabot[bot] commented 1 month ago

The following labels could not be found: nuget, .NET, packages, dependencies.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 1 month ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Analyzed 1 of 1 files.

Filename Status
:heavy_check_mark: .config/dotnet-tools.json Analyzed
gooroo-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

Identified Issues

No issues were found in the proposed changes. The version bump appears straightforward and does not introduce any new code or features that could be problematic.

Missing Tests

No new tests are needed for this change as it is simply a version bump for a tool dependency.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know what you think!

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 1 month ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.config/dotnet-tools.json - Updating the version of the tool csharpier from "0.29.1" to "0.29.2" without proper testing or knowledge of potential breaking changes in the new version could introduce compatibility issues with the existing codebase or dependencies.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.config/dotnet-tools.json - Before updating the tool version, it is recommended to refer to the release notes of version "0.29.2" to check for any breaking changes that may impact the usage of the tool in the project. Testing the updated version in a separate environment can help ensure compatibility and stability with the current setup.
pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 1 month ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: -- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` -- `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` -- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` -- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` -- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` -- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
instapr[bot] commented 1 month ago

Feedback

This PR looks good to merge. 🚀

deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 month ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 2983b66..04fa42a. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource C# LogoC#✅ SuccessView Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregateC#
Branch Coverage100%100%
Composite Coverage0%0%
Line Coverage0%0%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
guibranco commented 1 month ago

@dependabot squash and merge

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

5:11PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
5:11PM INF 27 commits scanned.
5:11PM INF scan completed in 65.4ms
5:11PM INF no leaks found
sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 month ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud