GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-template

🔬 Proof of Concept template repository for .NET
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-dotnet-template/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Replace install.bat with initial-setup.bat for setup tasks #39

Closed guibranco closed 14 hours ago

guibranco commented 14 hours ago

Description


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
initial-setup.bat
Introduce initial-setup.bat for initial setup execution   

initial-setup.bat
  • Created a new script file initial-setup.bat.
  • Added command to execute initial-setup.ps1 with PowerShell.
  • +1/-0     
    Bug fix
    install.bat
    Remove deprecated install.bat script                                         

    install.bat
  • Removed the old script file install.bat.
  • Deleted command to execute install.ps1.
  • +0/-1     

    Summary by Sourcery

    Rename and update the batch script to execute the initial setup using PowerShell, improving the setup process.

    Build:

    semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    Review changes with SemanticDiff.

    senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

    korbit-ai[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    You've used up your 5 PR reviews for this month under the Korbit Starter Plan. You'll get 5 more reviews on October 5th, 2024 or you can upgrade to Pro for unlimited PR reviews and enhanced features in your Korbit Console.

    codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

    1. initial-setup.bat:
      • This file just contains a command to execute a PowerShell script. It would be beneficial to add a check to confirm the existence of the initial-setup.ps1 script before executing it, to handle cases where the script is missing or renamed.

    Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

    1. initial-setup.bat:
      • Add a check to verify the presence of initial-setup.ps1 by using an IF EXIST condition before executing the PowerShell script to avoid errors if the file is missing.
      • Add a comment in the batch file to explain the purpose and usage to facilitate easier maintenance.
    pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    :wave: Hi there!

    1. Ensure consistency: Maintain uniform naming conventions for script files (e.g., initial-setup.ps1 & install.ps1).
    2. Add new lines at the end of files for readability and to comply with coding standards.
    3. Consider adding error handling mechanisms for better script robustness.

    Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

    sourcery-ai[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

    This pull request renames the 'install.bat' file to 'initial-setup.bat' and updates its content to execute a PowerShell script instead of containing the setup logic directly.

    File-Level Changes

    Change Details Files
    Renamed and updated the batch file for initial setup
    • Renamed 'install.bat' to 'initial-setup.bat'
    • Updated the batch file to execute a PowerShell script instead of containing setup logic
    initial-setup.bat
    install.bat

    Tips - Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments. - You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai): - Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide; - Change the review language; - You can always [contact us](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) if you have any questions or feedback.
    coderabbitai[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    [!WARNING]

    Rate limit exceeded

    @gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review.

    How to resolve this issue? After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
    How do rate limits work? CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.
    Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b677f68753b69b3ced13ac2a43b145c6dc176b95 and 700c5a4d157d0fb6b2b7647c254e839dec30d91e.

    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
    Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: -- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` -- `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` -- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` -- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` -- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` -- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
    instapr[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    Feedback:

    deepsource-io[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    Here's the code health analysis summary for commits b677f68..700c5a4. View details on DeepSource ↗.

    Analysis Summary

    AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
    DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage✅ SuccessView Check ↗
    DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
    DeepSource C# LogoC#✅ SuccessView Check ↗

    Code Coverage Report

    MetricAggregateC#
    Branch Coverage100%100%
    Composite Coverage0%0%
    Line Coverage0%0%

    💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
    gooroo-dev[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    Please double check the following review of the pull request:

    Issues counts

    🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
    0 0 0 0 1 1 0

    Changes in the diff

    Identified Issues

    ID Type Details Severity Confidence
    1 💪Best Practices Missing newline at the end of initial-setup.bat file. 🟡Low 🟠Medium
    2 📖Readability The script name change should be reflected in documentation if any. 🟡Low 🟠Medium

    Issue 1: Missing newline at the end of initial-setup.bat file

    Explanation

    The initial-setup.bat file is missing a newline at the end. This is generally considered a best practice for text files to ensure compatibility with various tools and editors.

    Fix

    Add a newline at the end of the initial-setup.bat file.

    Code

    diff --git a/initial-setup.bat b/initial-setup.bat
    index 717b71c..e69de29 100644
    --- a/initial-setup.bat
    +++ b/initial-setup.bat
    @@ -1 +1,2 @@
     powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File initial-setup.ps1
    +

    Explanation of the Fix

    Adding a newline at the end of the file ensures compatibility with various tools and editors that expect text files to end with a newline.

    Issue 2: The script name change should be reflected in documentation if any

    Explanation

    If there is any documentation that references install.bat, it should be updated to reflect the new script name initial-setup.bat.

    Fix

    Update any documentation that references install.bat to initial-setup.bat.

    Code

    Ensure that all documentation files are updated accordingly. This might include README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, or any other relevant documentation files.

    Explanation of the Fix

    Updating the documentation ensures that users are aware of the changes and can follow the correct instructions.

    Missing Tests

    Since the changes are related to renaming and updating script references, there are no specific tests required for these changes. However, ensure that any automated tests or CI/CD pipelines that reference install.bat are updated to initial-setup.bat.

    Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know your thoughts!

    penify-dev[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 2, because the changes are straightforward with the addition of a new script and the removal of an outdated one. The review mainly involves checking the correctness of the new script.
    🧪 Relevant tests No
    ⚡ Possible issues No
    🔒 Security concerns No
    penify-dev[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Add error handling to the PowerShell script execution ___ **Consider adding error handling to ensure that the PowerShell script executes successfully,
    as failing to do so may lead to silent failures.** [initial-setup.bat [1]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/POC-dotnet-template/pull/39/files#diff-f05db76ad235fc21574751386c6df57e11431797a4c84c4d76f198c13fceaa2cR1-R1) ```diff -powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File initial-setup.ps1 +powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File initial-setup.ps1 || (echo "Failed to execute initial-setup.ps1" && exit 1) ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion addresses a significant issue by adding error handling to the PowerShell script execution, which is crucial for ensuring that failures are caught and reported.
    8
    github-actions[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

    Scan results:

    8:13PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    8:13PM INF 32 commits scanned.
    8:13PM INF scan completed in 65.9ms
    8:13PM INF no leaks found
    
    sonarcloud[bot] commented 14 hours ago

    Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

    Issues
    0 New issues
    0 Accepted issues

    Measures
    0 Security Hotspots
    0.0% Coverage on New Code
    0.0% Duplication on New Code

    See analysis details on SonarCloud