GuilhermeStracini / POC-dotnet-template

🔬 Proof of Concept template repository for .NET
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-dotnet-template/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Restyle Add basic project structure #4

Closed restyled-io[bot] closed 2 months ago

restyled-io[bot] commented 2 months ago

Automated style fixes for #3, created by Restyled.

The following restylers made fixes:

To incorporate these changes, merge this Pull Request into the original. We recommend using the Squash or Rebase strategies.

NOTE: As work continues on the original Pull Request, this process will re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with updated style fixes as necessary. If the style is fixed manually at any point (i.e. this process finds no fixes to make), this Pull Request will be closed automatically.

Sorry if this was unexpected. To disable it, see our documentation.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 2 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Analyzed 2 of 3 files.

Overall, the semantic diff is 100% smaller than the GitHub diff.

2 files do not contain logic changes. Filename Status
:grey_question: _cofing.yml Unsupported file format
:heavy_check_mark: Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/UnitTest1.cs No logic changes found
:heavy_check_mark: Src/POCTemplate/Program.cs No logic changes found
senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 2 months ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. :tada: To get the most out of Senior Dev, please sign up in our Web App, connect your GitHub account, and add/join your organization GuilhermeStracini. After that, you will receive code reviews beginning on your next opened PR. :rocket:

korbit-ai[bot] commented 2 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 2 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

  1. Consistency in code formatting: Maintain consistent indentation (tabs vs spaces) throughout the files.
  2. Ensure proper commenting and documentation for clarity.
  3. Review and potentially refactor test names and structure for readability and best practices.

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 2 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. _cofing.yml:
    • The file name _cofing.yml seems to be a typo. It should be _config.yml for Jekyll to recognize it.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. Program.cs:

    • Consider adding exception handling in the Main method for better error management.
    • Maintain consistent indentation throughout the file.
  2. UnitTest1.cs:

    • The comments for Act section are missing. It's best practice to include comments describing the action being performed.
    • Ensure consistent formatting and indentation for better code readability.
    • Consider adding more meaningful test method names than Test1. This helps in quickly understanding the purpose of the test.
    • It's a good practice to have a clear Arrange, Act, Assert structure with comments for each step to improve code clarity.
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 months ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
instapr[bot] commented 2 months ago

Code Review Feedback:

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 1 0 0 0 1 0

Summary of Proposed Changes

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 🤪Typo Typo in the filename _cofing.yml, should be _config.yml. 🟠Medium 🔴High
2 📖Readability Inconsistent brace style in Program.cs and UnitTest1.cs. 🟡Low 🔴High

Issue 1

ID: 1
Type: 🤪Typo
Details: Typo in the filename _cofing.yml, should be _config.yml.
Severity: 🟠Medium
Confidence: 🔴High

Explanation: The filename _cofing.yml contains a typo. It should be _config.yml to follow standard naming conventions and avoid confusion.

Fix:

diff --git a/_cofing.yml b/_config.yml
similarity index 100%
rename from _cofing.yml
rename to _config.yml

Explanation of Fix: Renamed the file from _cofing.yml to _config.yml.

Issue 2

ID: 2
Type: 📖Readability
Details: Inconsistent brace style in Program.cs and UnitTest1.cs.
Severity: 🟡Low
Confidence: 🔴High

Explanation: The brace style in Program.cs and UnitTest1.cs is inconsistent. It is better to follow a consistent coding style for better readability and maintainability.

Fix:

diff --git a/Src/POCTemplate/Program.cs b/Src/POCTemplate/Program.cs
index 5c3347a..a01014d 100644
--- a/Src/POCTemplate/Program.cs
+++ b/Src/POCTemplate/Program.cs
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
 namespace POCTemplate;

-internal static class Program {
-  public static void Main() {
-    // This is a placeholder for the main entry point of the application.
-    Console.WriteLine("Hello, World!");
-  }
+internal static class Program
+{
+    public static void Main()
+    {
+        // This is a placeholder for the main entry point of the application.
+        Console.WriteLine("Hello, World!");
+    }
 }
diff --git a/Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/UnitTest1.cs b/Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/UnitTest1.cs
index 4e5aee1..9e1df13 100644
--- a/Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/UnitTest1.cs
+++ b/Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/UnitTest1.cs
@@ -2,15 +2,17 @@

 namespace POCTemplate.Tests;

-public class UnitTest1 {
-  [Fact]
-  public void Test1() {
-    // Arrange
-    const bool expected = true;
+public class UnitTest1
+{
+    [Fact]
+    public void Test1()
+    {
+        // Arrange
+        const bool expected = true;

-    // Act
+        // Act

-    // Assert
-    expected.Should().BeTrue();
-  }
+        // Assert
+        expected.Should().BeTrue();
+    }
 }

Explanation of Fix: Updated the brace style to be consistent across Program.cs and UnitTest1.cs.

General Review

The proposed changes improve the readability of the code by aligning braces and removing unnecessary newlines. However, there was a typo in the filename _cofing.yml which has been corrected. The overall code quality is good, but maintaining a consistent coding style is essential for better readability and maintainability.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know your opinion!

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

11:35PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:35PM INF 6 commits scanned.
11:35PM INF scan completed in 62.7ms
11:35PM INF no leaks found
korbit-ai[bot] commented 2 months ago

I have reviewed your code and found 4 potential issues. To discuss my individual comments that I have added, tag me in replies using @korbit-ai.


Please react with a 👍 to my comments that you find helpful and a 👎 to those you find unhelpful - this will help me learn and improve as we collaborate.