ci: add .deepsource.toml

[deepsource-autofix[bot]]

This pull request adds a .deepsource.toml.

Merging it will successfully integrate DeepSource with this repository. On every subsequent pull request, it will run analysis and report any issues that need to be fixed. Good work!

[semanticdiff-com[bot]]

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

[korbit-ai[bot]]

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

[senior-dev-bot[bot]]

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. :tada: To get the most out of Senior Dev, please sign up in our Web App, connect your GitHub account, and add/join your organization GuilhermeStracini. After that, you will receive code reviews beginning on your next opened PR. :rocket:

[codara-ai-code-review[bot]]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

1. /.deepsource.toml: The file ends without a newline character which might cause issues with some tools that expect a newline at the end of files.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

1. /.deepsource.toml: Consider adding a newline character at the end of the file to adhere to common conventions and prevent any compatibility issues with certain tools.

[pr-code-reviewer[bot]]

:wave: Hi there!

1. Maintain consistency in the structure by aligning the analyzer definitions correctly.
2. Ensure clear organization by defining each analyzer block with appropriate spacing.
3. Facilitate readability and avoid confusion by keeping the order of the analyzers consistent throughout the file.

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

[instapr[bot]]

Feedback:

• Looks good to me!
• Ready to merge once conflicts are resolved.

[deepsource-io[bot]]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits fefd04c..2c035be. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Test coverage	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success		View Check ↗
C#	✅ Success		View Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

Metric	Aggregate	C#
Branch Coverage	100%	100%
Composite Coverage	0%	0%
Line Coverage	0%	0%

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[gooroo-dev[bot]]

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issue Counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	1	1	1

Summary of Proposed Changes

• ➕ Added .deepsource.toml configuration file.
• 🛠️ Configured three analyzers: test-coverage, secrets, and csharp.
• ❓ Missing newline at the end of the file.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence
1	💪Best Practices	Missing newline at the end of the file (.deepsource.toml, line 10)	🟡Low	🔴High
2	📖Readability	The configuration file is minimal and could benefit from comments	🟡Low	🟠Medium
3	❓Others	The analyzers list might be incomplete or missing essential analyzers	🟠Medium	🟠Medium

Issue 1: Missing newline at the end of the file

Details: The file .deepsource.toml is missing a newline at the end of the file.

Code:

+name = "csharp"

Fix: Add a newline at the end of the file.

Fixed Code:

+name = "csharp"
+

Explanation: Adding a newline at the end of the file is a best practice for better compatibility with various tools and editors.

Issue 2: Lack of Comments

Details: The configuration file is minimal and could benefit from comments to explain the purpose of each section.

Code:

+version = 1
+
+[[analyzers]]
+name = "test-coverage"
+
+[[analyzers]]
+name = "secrets"
+
+[[analyzers]]
+name = "csharp"

Fix: Add comments to explain the purpose of each section.

Fixed Code:

+version = 1
+
+# Analyzer for test coverage
+[[analyzers]]
+name = "test-coverage"
+
+# Analyzer for detecting secrets in the code
+[[analyzers]]
+name = "secrets"
+
+# Analyzer for C# code
+[[analyzers]]
+name = "csharp"
+

Explanation: Adding comments improves readability and helps other developers understand the purpose of each section.

Issue 3: Potentially Incomplete Analyzers List

Details: The list of analyzers might be incomplete or missing essential analyzers for the project.

Code:

+[[analyzers]]
+name = "test-coverage"
+
+[[analyzers]]
+name = "secrets"
+
+[[analyzers]]
+name = "csharp"

Fix: Review and potentially expand the list of analyzers to include other relevant ones for the project.

Fixed Code:

+[[analyzers]]
+name = "test-coverage"
+
+[[analyzers]]
+name = "secrets"
+
+[[analyzers]]
+name = "csharp"
+
+# Example additional analyzers
+[[analyzers]]
+name = "javascript"
+
+[[analyzers]]
+name = "python"
+

Explanation: Ensuring that all relevant analyzers are included can help catch more issues and improve code quality.

General Review

The proposed changes add a .deepsource.toml configuration file with three analyzers. The file is minimal and could benefit from comments and a review of the analyzers list to ensure completeness. The most important issue is the missing newline at the end of the file, which should be addressed for better compatibility.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev I'd love a reaction or reply with your thoughts.

[korbit-ai[bot]]

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!

---

Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

[github-actions[bot]]

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

11:41PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:41PM INF 5 commits scanned.
11:41PM INF scan completed in 63.3ms
11:41PM INF no leaks found