GuilhermeStracini / apiclient-boilerplate-dotnet

💡 🏗️ A boilerplate API client template for .NET API clients wrappers
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/apiclient-boilerplate-dotnet/
MIT License
4 stars 1 forks source link

Enhance input prompts in initial-setup.sh #222

Closed guibranco closed 2 months ago

guibranco commented 2 months ago

User description

[!NOTE] I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other.


Description


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
initial-setup.sh
Enhance user input prompts in initial-setup.sh                     

initial-setup.sh
  • Updated input prompts to use the '-r' option for read command.
  • Improved user input handling for project setup.
  • +15/-15 

    Summary by Sourcery

    Enhance the initial-setup.sh script by adding the '-r' option to the 'read' command to prevent backslash escapes from being interpreted, improving the robustness of user input handling.

    Enhancements:

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Review changes with SemanticDiff.

    korbit-ai[bot] commented 2 months ago

    You've used up your 5 PR reviews for this month under the Korbit Starter Plan. You'll get 5 more reviews on October 5th, 2024 or you can upgrade to Pro for unlimited PR reviews and enhanced features in your Korbit Console.

    senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

    instapr[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Feedback:

    pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 2 months ago

    :wave: Hi there!

    Everything looks good!

    Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

    sourcery-ai[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

    This pull request updates the initial-setup.sh script by adding the -r option to all read commands. This change improves the script's handling of user input, particularly for inputs containing backslashes.

    File-Level Changes

    Change Details Files
    Added -r option to all read commands in the script
    • Added -r option to the read command for Project name input
    • Added -r option to the read command for Project description input
    • Added -r option to the read command for Solution name input
    • Added -r option to the read command for GitHub username input
    • Added -r option to the read command for GitHub repository input
    • Added -r option to the read command for AppVeyor project ID input
    • Added -r option to the read command for Codacy project ID input
    • Added -r option to the read command for Code Climate project ID input
    • Added -r option to the read command for Codebeat project UUID input
    • Added -r option to the read command for DeepSource project ID input
    • Added -r option to the read command for Company/Author name input
    • Added -r option to the read command for Codacy secure token input
    • Added -r option to the read command for Code Climate secure token input
    • Added -r option to the read command for Sonar Cloud secure token input
    • Added -r option to the read command for API documentation URL input
    initial-setup.sh

    Tips - Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments. - You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai): - Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide; - Change the review language; - You can always [contact us](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) if you have any questions or feedback.
    codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

    1. read -p -r syntax used in the script is incorrect. The -r flag should be followed by the prompt string in quotes as seen in the initial code snippet.

    Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

    1. Correct the read commands to include the -r flag directly after -p followed by the prompt string in quotes for each input to ensure proper functionality and readability.
    2. Consider adding input validation checks after reading user inputs to handle cases where users provide unexpected or incorrect input values to prevent script failures.
    gooroo-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Please double check the following review of the pull request:

    Issues counts

    🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Changes in the diff

    Identified Issues

    No issues were identified in the proposed changes.

    Missing Tests

    Since the changes are related to user input handling in a shell script, automated tests are not applicable. However, here are some manual test cases to ensure the changes work as expected:

    1. Test Case 1: Normal Input

      • Input: Provide normal text inputs for all prompts.
      • Expected Result: All inputs are correctly captured without any issues.
    2. Test Case 2: Input with Backslashes

      • Input: Provide inputs containing backslashes (e.g., C:\Path\To\Project).
      • Expected Result: Inputs are captured correctly without interpreting backslashes as escape characters.
    3. Test Case 3: Empty Input

      • Input: Leave some prompts empty.
      • Expected Result: Script should handle empty inputs gracefully without errors.
    4. Test Case 4: Special Characters

      • Input: Provide inputs with special characters (e.g., !@#$%^&*()).
      • Expected Result: Special characters should be captured correctly.

    Manual Testing Instructions

    1. Run the initial-setup.sh script.
    2. Follow the prompts and provide the inputs as specified in the test cases.
    3. Verify that the script captures and processes the inputs correctly according to the expected results.

    By following these manual test cases, you can ensure that the changes work as intended and handle various types of user inputs robustly.

    Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know what you think!

    coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Walkthrough

    The changes in the initial-setup.sh script involve the addition of the -r option to the read command prompts. This modification ensures that backslashes are not treated as escape characters, leading to improved handling of user input. The script continues to function as before, prompting users for project-related information while enhancing the robustness of the input process.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    initial-setup.sh Added -r option to read commands for better input handling.

    Suggested labels

    size/XS, korbit-code-analysis

    Poem

    Hop along, with joy we sing,
    In scripts where inputs freely spring.
    With -r in place, no escapes to fear,
    Our data flows smooth, oh so clear!
    A rabbit's cheer for changes bright,
    In code we trust, all feels just right! 🐇✨

    [!TIP]

    New features Walkthrough comment now includes: - Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context. - Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file. Notes: - Please share any feedback in the [discussion post](https://discordapp.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1282535539299323995) on our Discord. - Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
    Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
    penify-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 2, because the changes are straightforward and involve a simple enhancement to input handling without complex logic.
    🧪 Relevant tests No
    ⚡ Possible issues No
    🔒 Security concerns No
    penify-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Security
    Enhance security by masking sensitive input during prompts ___ **Ensure that sensitive information like tokens are not echoed back to the terminal for
    security reasons.** [initial-setup.sh [15]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/apiclient-boilerplate-dotnet/pull/222/files#diff-1ceb590caedea018abc0de8fd3b2b75b80a9ffa7e3007499e419604503ca57d6R15-R15) ```diff -read -p -r 'Codacy secure token (AppVeyor): ' CodacyToken +read -s -p 'Codacy secure token (AppVeyor): ' CodacyToken ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: This suggestion addresses a significant security concern by masking sensitive input, which is crucial for protecting user data.
    9
    Possible issue
    Add input validation to ensure user inputs conform to expected formats ___ **Validate user input after each prompt to ensure it meets expected formats or constraints.** [initial-setup.sh [18]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/apiclient-boilerplate-dotnet/pull/222/files#diff-1ceb590caedea018abc0de8fd3b2b75b80a9ffa7e3007499e419604503ca57d6R18-R18) ```diff -read -p -r 'API documentation URL: ' DocumentationWebsite +read -p -r 'API documentation URL: ' DocumentationWebsite; [[ ! $DocumentationWebsite =~ ^https?:// ]] && echo "Invalid URL format." ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Input validation is important for ensuring data integrity, but the implementation suggested is basic and may require more robust handling for various input cases.
    7
    Best practice
    Simplify the read command by removing unnecessary options ___ **Remove the redundant -r option from the read command as it is not necessary for the
    prompts.** [initial-setup.sh [4]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/apiclient-boilerplate-dotnet/pull/222/files#diff-1ceb590caedea018abc0de8fd3b2b75b80a9ffa7e3007499e419604503ca57d6R4-R4) ```diff -read -p -r 'Project name (readable version): ' ProjectName +read -p 'Project name (readable version): ' ProjectName ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While the `-r` option is not strictly necessary for the prompts, removing it does simplify the command. However, it may affect how backslashes are handled in user input, so caution is advised.
    6
    Enhancement
    Improve user experience by providing default values in prompts ___ **Consider adding a default value for prompts where applicable to enhance user experience.** [initial-setup.sh [7]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/apiclient-boilerplate-dotnet/pull/222/files#diff-1ceb590caedea018abc0de8fd3b2b75b80a9ffa7e3007499e419604503ca57d6R7-R7) ```diff -read -p 'GitHub username: ' GitHubUsername +read -p 'GitHub username (default: user123): ' GitHubUsername ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: Adding default values can improve user experience, but it may not be applicable for all prompts. This suggestion is useful but not critical.
    5
    github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

    Scan results:

    12:27PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    12:27PM INF 313 commits scanned.
    12:27PM INF scan completed in 102ms
    12:27PM INF no leaks found
    
    codeclimate[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Code Climate has analyzed commit c2b59f2a and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

    View more on Code Climate.

    sonarcloud[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

    Issues
    0 New issues
    0 Accepted issues

    Measures
    0 Security Hotspots
    0.0% Coverage on New Code
    0.0% Duplication on New Code

    See analysis details on SonarCloud