GuilhermeStracini / apiclient-boilerplate-dotnet

💡 🏗️ A boilerplate API client template for .NET API clients wrappers
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/apiclient-boilerplate-dotnet/
MIT License
4 stars 1 forks source link

Bump Moq from 4.20.70 to 4.20.72 #227

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 2 months ago

dependabot[bot] commented 2 months ago

Bumps Moq from 4.20.70 to 4.20.72.

Release notes

Sourced from Moq's releases.

v4.20.72

What's Changed

🔨 Other

Full Changelog: https://github.com/devlooped/moq/compare/v4.20.71...v4.20.72

v4.20.71

What's Changed

🔨 Other

New Contributors

Full Changelog: https://github.com/devlooped/moq/compare/v4.20.70...v4.20.71

Changelog

Sourced from Moq's changelog.

v4.20.72 (2024-09-07)

Full Changelog

:hammer: Other:

  • Question: Sponsorable Attribute in release v4.20.71 #1513

:twisted_rightwards_arrows: Merged:

v4.20.71 (2024-09-03)

Full Changelog

:bug: Fixed bugs:

  • Documentation link gives 404 #1495
  • Documentation link is broken #1487

:hammer: Other:

  • Documentation Unavailable Online #1473
  • Some source code files is filled with comments like: "Unmerged change from project " #1451
  • Question: would it make sense to call verify all on a strict mock when the mock gets disposed? #1440
  • SponsorLink Integration Makes Moq Unuasable due to PII and GDPR Requirements #1433
  • Default value ILookup<> in loose mode is null #1391
  • Verifying a protected method when the exact parameter types are not statically known #1339

:twisted_rightwards_arrows: Merged:

Commits
  • 959fc51 Remove unused attribute
  • ede9996 ⬆️ Bump files with dotnet-file sync
  • f8db318 🖉 Update changelog with v4.20.71
  • aecc471 ⬆️ Bump files with dotnet-file sync
  • 99d243b Fix whitespace in test project
  • ac56c3d Fix repo variable actions context
  • ac3a8aa Prereleases ship only to CI feed
  • ea92109 Bump Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions in the extensions group
  • 4bdb19a Remove SourceLink which is now built-in the SDK
  • c0a33bd Use windows agent for build, variable for publish
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
korbit-ai[bot] commented 2 months ago

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

dependabot[bot] commented 2 months ago

The following labels could not be found: nuget, packages.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 2 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 2 months ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

instapr[bot] commented 2 months ago

Feedback on PR

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 2 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 2 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. Tests/SolutionName.IntegrationTests/SolutionName.IntegrationTests.csproj:

    • Updating the Moq package version may introduce compatibility issues with existing code or other packages. It's advisable to thoroughly test the integration tests after this change to ensure no regression occurs.
  2. Tests/SolutionName.Tests/SolutionName.Tests.csproj:

    • Similar to the previous point, updating the Moq package version here may also lead to compatibility issues. Comprehensive testing of the unit tests is recommended.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. Consider updating the project documentation or a changelog to reflect the change in the Moq package version, informing other developers about the modification.
  2. To mitigate potential issues arising from package version updates, maintain a systematic approach by following a versioning strategy and ensuring backward compatibility with existing code.
gooroo-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence

There are no changes in the diff, so no issues have been identified.

Missing Tests

Since there are no changes in the diff, no new tests are required.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Add a reaction or reply to share your feedback!

coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 months ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
guibranco commented 2 months ago

@dependabot squash and merge

codeclimate[bot] commented 2 months ago

Code Climate has analyzed commit bb874c7d and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

6:02PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
6:02PM INF 319 commits scanned.
6:02PM INF scan completed in 93.9ms
6:02PM INF no leaks found
sonarcloud[bot] commented 2 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud