Simplify Infisical Secrets Check in Workflow

guibranco commented 2 months ago

User description

Resolves #ISSUE_NUMBER

Before the change?

After the change?

Pull request checklist

[ ] Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features)
[ ] Docs have been reviewed and added/updated if needed (for bug fixes/features)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

[!NOTE] I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.

Description

Streamlined the Infisical secrets check by using a dedicated GitHub Action.
Removed unnecessary installation and reporting steps to improve efficiency.
This change enhances the maintainability of the workflow.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

infisical-secrets-check.yml

Simplify Infisical Secrets Check Workflow

.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml

Replaced multiple steps for Infisical secrets check with a single
action.

Simplified the workflow by using
guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2.

Removed redundant installation and artifact upload steps.

+2/-88

Summary by Sourcery

Simplify the Infisical secrets check workflow by replacing the custom script with a pre-built GitHub action, reducing complexity and maintenance overhead.

CI:

Replace custom Infisical secrets check workflow with a pre-built GitHub action for improved simplicity and maintainability.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 2 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 2 months ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

korbit-ai[bot] commented 2 months ago

You've used up your 5 PR reviews for this month under the Korbit Starter Plan. You'll get 5 more reviews on October 5th, 2024 or you can upgrade to Pro for unlimited PR reviews and enhanced features in your Korbit Console.

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 2 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Add necessary steps for setting up any required environment or dependencies before running the script, such as installing missing packages.
Ensure proper error handling and cleanup processes in case of failures or errors during the execution of each step.
Enhance security practices by avoiding direct installation from URLs and considering more secure methods for package installation.

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 2 months ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the GitHub workflow file for Infisical secrets check. The main change is replacing a series of manual steps with a single action, simplifying the workflow and potentially improving its reliability and maintainability.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Replace manual Infisical secrets check steps with a GitHub action	Remove steps for installing Infisical CLI and other tools Remove steps for running the scan manually Remove steps for generating and uploading reports Remove steps for reading and commenting on scan results Add a single step using the github-infisical-secrets-check-action	`.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml`

Tips

- Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments. - You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai): - Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide; - Change the review language; - You can always [contact us](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) if you have any questions or feedback.

instapr[bot] commented 2 months ago

### Feedback
- **Before the change:**
  - Missing description of the current behavior being modified.

- **After the change:**
  - Missing description of the behavior or changes added by this PR.

- **Pull request checklist:**
  - [x] Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features)
  - [ ] Docs have been reviewed and added/updated if needed (for bug fixes/features)

- **Breaking change:**
  - [ ] Yes
  - [ ] No

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 2 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
- Deleting the steps for setting the Infisical package source, installing tools, running a scan, generating a report, uploading artifacts, reading log files, and updating PR comments can lead to missing crucial steps for the Infisical secrets check workflow. Ensure all necessary actions are still included in the workflow after this change.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
- Consider adding comments or a description to the new step "Infisical secrets check" to provide clarity on what this action is doing.
- As a best practice, maintain consistency in formatting and naming conventions throughout the workflow file to improve readability and maintainability.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 months ago

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.

Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between adfa1279a4d9f84d07343a7b6ecec45d87b32b0f and fb2b090c3da025df07a12f605e914ea3f088e085.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: -- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` -- `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` -- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` -- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` -- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` -- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Changes in the diff

➖ Removed steps for setting up Infisical package source.
➖ Removed steps for installing tools (Infisical, csvkit, csv-to-markdown-table).
➖ Removed steps for running the scan and generating reports.
➖ Removed steps for uploading artifacts (log, csv, md).
➖ Removed steps for reading secrets-result.log and secrets-result.md.
➖ Removed step for updating PR with a comment based on scan results.
➕ Added a single step to use guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence
1	💪Best Practices	The new action `guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2` should be verified for compatibility and correctness.	🟠Medium	🟠Medium

Issue 1: Best Practices

Details: The new action guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2 should be verified for compatibility and correctness to ensure it performs all the necessary checks and reporting as the previous steps did.

File Path: .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml

Lines of Code: 27-28

Explanation: The new action replaces multiple steps that were previously handling the setup, scan, and reporting. It is crucial to ensure that this new action covers all the functionalities provided by the removed steps.

Proposed Fix:

Verify the new action's documentation to ensure it performs all necessary tasks.
Test the workflow to confirm it behaves as expected.

Example Code:

      - name: Infisical secrets check
        uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2

Explanation of the Fix: The fix involves verifying and testing the new action to ensure it maintains the same level of functionality and reliability as the previous steps.

Missing Tests

Since the changes involve replacing multiple steps with a single action, it is important to add tests to ensure the new action works as expected. Here are some suggested tests:

Test for Successful Scan:
- Ensure the action completes successfully when no secrets are found.
- Verify the correct message is posted to the PR.
Test for Failed Scan:
- Introduce a known secret in the codebase.
- Ensure the action detects the secret and fails.
- Verify the correct failure message is posted to the PR.
Test for Artifact Upload:
- Ensure the action uploads the necessary artifacts (logs, reports) when a failure occurs.
Test for Compatibility:
- Ensure the action is compatible with the current CI environment and does not introduce any breaking changes.

By performing these tests, we can ensure the new action is a reliable replacement for the previous steps.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know what you think!

penify-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are mostly straightforward and involve replacing multiple steps with a single action, which simplifies the workflow.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

penify-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Add error handling to the Infisical secrets check action ___ Consider adding error handling for the Infisical secrets check action to ensure that failures are properly reported and managed. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/apiclient-boilerplate-dotnet/pull/234/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R25-R25) ```diff - name: Infisical secrets check uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2 +continue-on-error: true ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding error handling with 'continue-on-error: true' is a good practice to manage failures gracefully, enhancing the robustness of the workflow.	8
Possible issue	Add a check for the Infisical CLI installation before running the secrets check ___ Consider adding a step to check if the Infisical CLI is installed before running the secrets check to avoid potential errors. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/apiclient-boilerplate-dotnet/pull/234/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R25-R25) ```diff +- name: Check Infisical CLI installation +run: \| + if ! command -v infisical &> /dev/null; then + echo "Infisical CLI is not installed. Please install it before running the secrets check." + exit 1 + fi - name: Infisical secrets check uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2 ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding a check for the Infisical CLI installation is a proactive measure to prevent runtime errors, improving the reliability of the workflow.	7
Enhancement	Update the Infisical secrets check action to use the latest version ___ Ensure that the version of the Infisical secrets check action is the latest stable version to benefit from any recent updates or bug fixes. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/apiclient-boilerplate-dotnet/pull/234/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R25-R25) ```diff - name: Infisical secrets check -uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2 +uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@latest ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While using the latest version can provide benefits, changing to 'latest' may introduce breaking changes unexpectedly; thus, it's a moderate enhancement.	6
Enhancement	Add a notification step to alert the team in case of a failure in the secrets check ___ It may be beneficial to add a notification step to alert the team in case of a failure in the secrets check. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/apiclient-boilerplate-dotnet/pull/234/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R25-R25) ```diff - name: Infisical secrets check uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2 +- name: Notify team on failure +if: failure() +run: \| + echo "Infisical secrets check failed. Please review the logs." ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: Adding a notification step can improve team awareness of failures, but it is not critical for the functionality of the workflow, making it a minor enhancement.	5