Closed guibranco closed 3 months ago
actions-rs/clippy-check@v1
is replaced with clechasseur/rs-clippy-check@v3
. This change in the linter action version could introduce compatibility issues or behavioral changes that may need further validation.actions-rs/clippy-check@v1
to clechasseur/rs-clippy-check@v3
is crucial.v3
of rs-clippy-check
is compatible with your workflow and requirements.secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN
) is correctly passed for access control.The description could be more helpful.
Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.
Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. :tada: To get the most out of Senior Dev, please sign up in our Web App, connect your GitHub account, and add/join your organization GuilhermeStracini. After that, you will receive code reviews beginning on your next opened PR. :rocket:
🐞Mistake | 🤪Typo | 🚨Security | 🚀Performance | 💪Best Practices | 📖Readability | ❓Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
✅ The change updates the GitHub Action used for running Clippy from actions-rs/clippy-check@v1
to clechasseur/rs-clippy-check@v3
.
ID | Type | Details | Severity | Confidence |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 💪Best Practices | The new action clechasseur/rs-clippy-check@v3 should be verified for trustworthiness and maintenance. |
🟠Medium | 🟠Medium |
clechasseur/rs-clippy-check@v3
is not as widely known or documented as actions-rs/clippy-check@v1
. This change introduces a dependency on a less familiar action, which may not be as well-maintained or secure.
.github/workflows/linter.yml
# Verify the trustworthiness and maintenance status of the new action before merging
# Optionally, revert to the original action if concerns are found
# uses: actions-rs/clippy-check@v1
clechasseur/rs-clippy-check@v3
before merging the pull request.actions-rs/clippy-check@v1
.Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know your thoughts!
Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!
Scan results:
[90m10:38PM[0m [32mINF[0m scanning for exposed secrets...
[90m10:38PM[0m [32mINF[0m 62 commits scanned.
[90m10:38PM[0m [32mINF[0m scan completed in 66.4ms
[90m10:38PM[0m [32mINF[0m no leaks found
[!WARNING]
Rate limit exceeded
@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 59 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review.
How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 89e5ac404adf19da0f96e4555e22eccf338a9ff2 and ed418ff739d47373624733a2b1ad9b1d4c098aca.
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!