Update infisical-secrets-check.yml

[guibranco]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated GitHub workflow to add permissions for contents: read and pull-requests: write in the secrets-scan job configuration.

[korbit-ai[bot]]

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

[codara-ai-code-review[bot]]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - Adding permissions for contents and pull-requests without a clear purpose can potentially lead to unintended access control issues.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - It's important to provide a comment or documentation explaining why the contents and pull-requests permissions are being set to read and write respectively to ensure clarity and understanding for future maintainers.

[pr-code-reviewer[bot]]

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

[coderabbitai[bot]]

[!WARNING]

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The recent update to the .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml workflow file advances its secrets-scan job configuration by incorporating permissions for contents: read and pull-requests: write. This change enhances security by defining explicit access levels required for content reading and pull request modifications during the secrets scanning process.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/.../infisical-secrets-check.yml	Added permissions for contents: read and pull-requests: write in secrets-scan job configuration.

Poem

In the land of code where secrets guard, Permissions granted, none barred. For contents we read, and pull-requests write, Ensuring security stays ever tight. 🎩 With changes made, in the workflow bright, Happy coding days are in our sight!

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[gooroo-dev[bot]]

Issue Counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Summary of Proposed Changes

• ➕ Added permissions section to the secrets-scan job to specify required permissions:
  • contents: read
  • pull-requests: write

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the proposed changes.

General Review

The proposed changes add necessary permissions to the secrets-scan job in the GitHub Actions workflow. This is a best practice to ensure that the job has the least privilege necessary to perform its tasks. The code quality and style are consistent with the existing code, and the changes are clear and well-justified. No further issues were found.

Yours, Gooroo.dev I'd love to hear your thoughts! React or reply.

[github-actions[bot]]

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

1:36AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
1:36AM INF 66 commits scanned.
1:36AM INF scan completed in 67.4ms
1:36AM INF no leaks found