Update README.md

[guibranco]

Description by Korbit AI

[!NOTE] This feature is in early access. You can enable or disable it in the Korbit Console.

What change is being made?

Update the README.md to include AppVeyor CI pipeline information, support for Linux/MAC environments, and improve formatting consistency.

Why are these changes being made?

The changes provide additional CI pipeline options, expand the automated setup process to Linux/MAC environments, and enhance readability and clarity of the instructions. This ensures the repository is more accessible and easier to use for a broader audience.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Expanded setup instructions now support both Windows and Linux/MAC environments, improving accessibility for a wider audience.

• Documentation

  • Enhanced clarity and consistency in the README file, including improved formatting and the addition of relevant CI information for the AppVeyor pipeline.

[semanticdiff-com[bot]]

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

[korbit-ai[bot]]

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

[senior-dev-bot[bot]]

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

[pr-code-reviewer[bot]]

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

[codara-ai-code-review[bot]]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

1. README.md: The manual process mentions deleting README.md and renaming README.template.md to README.md. This can cause loss of important information or instructions if not followed correctly.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

1. README.md: Consider providing detailed steps or warnings when instructing users to delete files to prevent accidental data loss.
2. README.md: Add more specific instructions on how to update the Cargo.toml package name to ensure clarity for users.
3. README.md: Ensure consistent punctuation usage in instructions (e.g., consistently use periods at the end of sentences).
4. README.md: Provide a consistent format for mentioning different CI tools to maintain readability and formatting uniformity throughout the document.
5. README.md: Encourage users to backup any important files before making changes to the repository to prevent accidental data loss.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

[!CAUTION]

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the README.md file significantly enhance the clarity and usability of the setup instructions for the repository template. Key improvements include support for both Windows and Linux/MAC environments, broadening accessibility for developers. Additionally, the formatting has been refined for consistency, and a note regarding the appveyor.yml file clarifies CI options, making the guide more user-friendly for newcomers.

Changes

File	Change Summary
README.md	Enhanced setup instructions for Windows and Linux/MAC. Improved formatting consistency. Added note about appveyor.yml for CI options.

Poem

🐰 In the meadow, setups thrive,
With Windows, Linux, all alive!
The README shines, clear as day,
Guiding new friends on their way.
With consistency, we now rejoice,
A helpful guide, a happy choice!
🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[instapr[bot]]

Feedback:

• Consider providing more specific details in the PR description.
• Avoid future tense statements in the PR content.

Overall, the changes look good!👍

Let me know if you need further assistance.

[gooroo-dev[bot]]

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issues Summary Table

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	1	0

Summary of Proposed Changes

• ➕ Added note about the inclusion of appveyor.yml for AppVeyor CI pipeline.
• ✅ Updated the warning to indicate that the automated process now supports Windows and Linux/MAC environments.
• 📖 Improved readability by adding periods at the end of list items in the Automated and Manual process sections.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence
1	📖Readability	The note about AppVeyor CI pipeline could be more concise and clear.	🟡Low	🟡Low

Issue 1: 📖Readability

Details: The note about AppVeyor CI pipeline could be more concise and clear.
File Path: README.md
Lines: 10-13

Current Text:

> A [appveyor.yml](appveyor.yml) file is included for [AppVeyor](https://www.appveyor.com/) CI pipeline.
> AppVeyor is free for open-source projects.
> For closed-source projects, consider a paid subscription or other CI tools (GitHub Actions, CircleCI, TeamCity).

Suggested Fix:

> A [appveyor.yml](appveyor.yml) file is included for [AppVeyor](https://www.appveyor.com/) CI pipeline, which is free for open-source projects. For closed-source projects, consider a paid subscription or other CI tools (GitHub Actions, CircleCI, TeamCity).

Explanation: This revised note is more concise and combines related information into a single sentence for better readability.

General Review

The proposed changes improve the README.md file by making it more readable and updating the instructions to reflect the current state of the project. The changes are well-structured and enhance the clarity of the instructions. The only minor issue identified is related to the readability of the note about the AppVeyor CI pipeline, which can be improved by making the text more concise.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev I'd love a reaction or reply to know your thoughts.

[github-actions[bot]]

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

1:08PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
1:08PM INF 73 commits scanned.
1:08PM INF scan completed in 70.1ms
1:08PM INF no leaks found