search

GuilhermeStracini / apiclient-boilerplate-rs

:bulb: :building_construction: A boilerplate API client template for Rust API clients wrappers
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/apiclient-boilerplate-rs/
MIT License
1 stars 1 forks source link

GitAuto: [BUG] Secure variables only for own repositories/PRs #45

Closed gitauto-ai[bot] closed 2 months ago

gitauto-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

Original issue: #40

Why the bug occurs

The bug occurs because secure environment variables are not accessible in builds triggered from forked repositories. This is a security measure to prevent exposure of sensitive information.

How to reproduce

  1. Fork the repository.
  2. Create a pull request from the forked repository.
  3. Observe the build process failing when it tries to access secure environment variables.

How to fix

To fix this issue, we need to conditionally execute steps that require secure environment variables only if the build is not triggered from a forked pull request. We can use the APPVEYOR_PULL_REQUEST_HEAD_REPO_NAME environment variable to detect if the PR is from a forked repository.

Changes made:

Example:

- ps: if(-Not $env:APPVEYOR_PULL_REQUEST_HEAD_REPO_NAME) {
    // Execute the action
    codeclimate-test-reporter upload-coverage -i "Tests\\%SOLUTION_NAME%.UnitTests\\code-climate.json" -r %CODECLIMATE_TOKEN%
}

"""

Test these changes locally

git checkout -b gitauto/issue-#40-b883ede7-c551-441f-b5c4-4e2d27e158c3
git pull origin gitauto/issue-#40-b883ede7-c551-441f-b5c4-4e2d27e158c3
semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 3 months ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

  1. Consistency: Ensure consistent indentation, naming conventions, and code style throughout.
  2. Comments: Add or improve comments to clarify complex logic, functions, or any unclear sections.
  3. Optimization: Look for opportunities to optimize performance, reduce redundancy, or improve the overall efficiency of the code.

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

    • const getData = async () => {
    • throw new Error('Failed to fetch data');
    • return data;
    • } catch (error) {
    • console.error('Error fetching data:', error);
    • }
    • };

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

    • const fetchData = async () => {
    • const data = await response.json();
    • return data;
  4. };
    • console.error('Error fetching data:', error);
    • throw error;
gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 months ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

Since the diff provided is empty, there are no changes to summarize.

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence

Since the diff provided is empty, there are no issues to identify or address.

Missing Tests

Since the diff provided is empty, there are no changes to generate tests for.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Please add a reaction or reply to let me know your thoughts.

instapr[bot] commented 3 months ago

Feedback:

Overall, well done on addressing the security issue caused by inaccessible secure environment variables in forked repository builds.

Suggestion: Consider adding a section summarizing the impact of these changes on the build process in the pull request description for better visibility and understanding for reviewers.

Great work! 🚀👍

guibranco commented 3 months ago

@gstraccini help

gstraccini[bot] commented 3 months ago

That's what I can do :neckbeard:: -[ ] @gstraccini help: Shows the help message with available commands. -[ ] @gstraccini hello: Says hello to the invoker. -[ ] @gstraccini thank you: Replies with you are welcome message to the invoker. -[ ] @gstraccini appveyor build <type>: Runs the AppVeyor build for the target commit and/or pull request.

Multiple commands can be issued at the same time. Just respect each command pattern (with bot name prefix + command).

[!Warning]

If you aren't allowed to use this bot, a reaction with a thumbs down will be added to your comment.

[!Important]

You can tick (✅) one item from the above list, and it will be triggered! (In beta).

gstraccini[bot] commented 3 months ago

That's what I can do :neckbeard::

Multiple commands can be issued at the same time. Just respect each command pattern (with bot name prefix + command).

[!Warning]

If you aren't allowed to use this bot, a reaction with a thumbs down will be added to your comment.

[!Important]

You can tick (✅) one item from the above list, and it will be triggered! (In beta).

guibranco commented 3 months ago

@gstraccini help

gstraccini[bot] commented 3 months ago

That's what I can do :neckbeard::

Multiple commands can be issued at the same time. Just respect each command pattern (with bot name prefix + command).

[!Warning]

If you aren't allowed to use this bot, a reaction with a thumbs down will be added to your comment.

[!Important]

You can tick (✅) one item from the above list, and it will be triggered! (In beta).

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

3:30AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
3:30AM INF 79 commits scanned.
3:30AM INF scan completed in 68.2ms
3:30AM INF no leaks found