Simplify Infisical secrets check in GitHub Actions

guibranco commented 1 month ago

User description

Resolves #ISSUE_NUMBER

Before the change?

After the change?

Pull request checklist

[ ] Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features)
[ ] Docs have been reviewed and added/updated if needed (for bug fixes/features)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

[!NOTE] I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.

Description

Streamlined the Infisical secrets check process by consolidating multiple steps into a single action.
Improved maintainability and readability of the workflow file.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

infisical-secrets-check.yml

Simplified Infisical secrets check workflow

.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml

Replaced multiple steps for Infisical secrets check with a single
action.

Updated to use guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2.

+2/-54

Summary by Sourcery

Simplify the Infisical secrets check workflow by using a dedicated GitHub Action instead of custom script steps.

CI:

Replace manual Infisical secrets check steps with the guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2 action.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 1 month ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

You've used up your 5 PR reviews for this month under the Korbit Starter Plan. You'll get 5 more reviews on October 5th, 2024 or you can upgrade to Pro for unlimited PR reviews and enhanced features in your Korbit Console.

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 1 month ago

:wave: Hi there!

Improve security by not using sudo in certain commands unless absolutely necessary.
Enhance readability by breaking down the script into smaller, more focused steps.
Ensure consistency in handling and reporting errors throughout the workflow.

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the GitHub workflow file for Infisical secrets check. The main change is replacing the manual installation and execution of Infisical with a pre-built GitHub action.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Replace manual Infisical setup and execution with a GitHub action	Remove steps for setting up Infisical package source Remove Infisical installation step Remove manual scan execution step Remove steps for reading and processing scan results Remove steps for updating PR with comments based on scan results Add a single step using the github-infisical-secrets-check-action	`.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml`

Tips

- Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments. - You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai): - Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide; - Change the review language; - You can always [contact us](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) if you have any questions or feedback.

instapr[bot] commented 1 month ago

### Before the change?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->

* Missing description of original behavior

### After the change?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by this PR. -->

* Removal of script for setting up Infisical package source and installing Infisical
* Removal of actions for scanning, reading logs, and updating PR comments

### Pull request checklist
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features)
- [ ] Docs have been reviewed and added/updated if needed (for bug fixes/features)

### Does this introduce a breaking change?
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, make sure to note it here and what the impact might be -->

- [ ] Yes
- [x] No

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 1 month ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
- The previous steps in the GitHub workflow that performed actions like setting Infisical package source, installing Infisical, running a scan, reading logs, and updating the PR with a comment have been removed. This removal may result in missing functionality for scanning secrets and providing detailed scan results in pull requests. Make sure the new action covers all necessary functionalities previously implemented.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
- Consider adding a step in the new action to provide detailed scan results or handling of secrets leakage scenarios to replicate the functionality that was previously available. This will ensure comprehensive reporting of scan results.
- Document the changes made in the workflow file, explaining the shift from using custom shell commands to a pre-existing action for conducting Infisical secrets check. It will help in understanding the workflow evolution for future developers.

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Changes in the diff

➖ Removed steps for setting Infisical package source, installing Infisical, running scan, reading logs, and updating PR with comments.
➕ Added a single step using guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2 for Infisical secrets check.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence
N/A	N/A	No issues identified in the incoming changes.	N/A	N/A

No issues were found in the incoming changes.

Missing Tests

No tests are required for this change as it is a configuration update for a GitHub Actions workflow. The functionality relies on the external action guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2, which should have its own tests and validation.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know your thoughts!

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 42 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.

Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 73717b1b4df55c30d2854b5340053fc16ec811ee and ec23c0404c03ae8d1de66d8ab14a4744f5d2a1d1.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: -- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` -- `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` -- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` -- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` -- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` -- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve replacing multiple steps with a single action, which simplifies the workflow.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Add error handling to the secrets check action to manage failures gracefully ___ Consider adding error handling for the secrets check action to ensure that any failures are properly reported and handled in the workflow. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25-26]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/apiclient-boilerplate-rs/pull/58/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R25-R26) ```diff - name: Infisical secrets check uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2 + continue-on-error: true ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding error handling with 'continue-on-error: true' is a good practice to manage failures gracefully in workflows, enhancing robustness.	8
Enhancement	Add a notification step to inform the team if secrets are detected during the check ___ Consider adding a notification step to alert the team via email or Slack if secrets are detected during the check. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25-26]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/apiclient-boilerplate-rs/pull/58/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R25-R26) ```diff - name: Infisical secrets check uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2 +- name: Notify team + if: failure() + run: echo "Secrets detected! Please check the logs." ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding a notification step can improve team awareness and response to issues, making it a valuable enhancement.	7
Enhancement	Update the action to use the latest stable version for improved reliability ___ Ensure that the version of the action used is the latest stable release to benefit from any recent updates or bug fixes. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25-26]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/apiclient-boilerplate-rs/pull/58/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R25-R26) ```diff - name: Infisical secrets check - uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2 + uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@latest ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: Updating to the latest version can improve reliability, but this is a routine maintenance suggestion and not critical.	5
Maintainability	Add a cleanup step to remove temporary files created during the secrets check ___ It may be beneficial to include a step to clean up any temporary files generated during the secrets check to avoid clutter in the workflow environment. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25-26]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/apiclient-boilerplate-rs/pull/58/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R25-R26) ```diff - name: Infisical secrets check uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.2 +- name: Clean up + run: rm -f secrets-result.log secrets-result.csv ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While cleanup is important for maintainability, it is a minor enhancement compared to critical error handling.	6