Update deep-source.yml - Githubissues

guibranco commented 3 months ago

Resolves #ISSUE_NUMBER

Before the change?

After the change?

Pull request checklist

[ ] Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features)
[ ] Docs have been reviewed and added/updated if needed (for bug fixes/features)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Update the deep-source.yml workflow to modify the test coverage output path and reporting command.

Why are these changes being made?

The changes ensure that the test coverage results are stored in a consistent directory (../Results/) and correctly referenced in the DeepSource report command, improving the accuracy and reliability of the coverage reporting process.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 3 months ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

instapr[bot] commented 3 months ago

### Comments:
- Please include a brief description of the current behavior that you are modifying and the behavior or changes added by this PR.
- Update the Pull Request checklist by marking the tasks that have been completed.
- Indicate if this PR introduces a breaking change.

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

/.github/workflows/deep-source.yml
- The path ./bin/deepsource seems to be changed to a different location (Tests/Results/) without clarifying if the file has actually moved or this is a mistake. Ensure this path change is intentional and reflects the actual file location.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

/.github/workflows/deep-source.yml
- It would be beneficial to verify and confirm the path changes made for the file coverage.cobertura.xml in order to avoid any potential failures in locating the file during the workflow execution.
- Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of the changes made to enhance code readability for future maintainers.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 19 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.

Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 264084f8defd813e2565664ad628bd4995422e5c and cc27b86ec48fe92f189085fc1f433df228c9c3fa.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 months ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Changes in the diff

✅ Corrected the output path for the test coverage report in dotnet test command.
✅ Updated the path in the deepsource report command to match the new output path.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence
1	💪Best Practices	The path for the coverage output should be more descriptive and consistent with other paths.	🟠Medium	🟠Medium

Issue 1: Path Consistency

Explanation

The current path ../Results/ is not very descriptive and may lead to confusion. It is better to use a more descriptive path that aligns with the project's directory structure.

Code to Address the Issue

- dotnet test -c Debug --verbosity minimal --no-build --no-restore /p:CollectCoverage=true /p:CoverletOutputFormat="cobertura" /p:CoverletOutput='../Results/'
+ dotnet test -c Debug --verbosity minimal --no-build --no-restore /p:CollectCoverage=true /p:CoverletOutputFormat="cobertura" /p:CoverletOutput='./TestResults/coverage.cobertura.xml'
- ./bin/deepsource report --analyzer test-coverage --key csharp --value-file Tests/Results/coverage.cobertura.xml
+ ./bin/deepsource report --analyzer test-coverage --key csharp --value-file ./TestResults/coverage.cobertura.xml

Explanation of the Fix

Changed the output path to ./TestResults/coverage.cobertura.xml for better clarity and consistency.
Updated the path in the deepsource report command to match the new output path.

Missing Tests

No new tests are required for these changes as they are related to configuration and not to the application logic.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Share your thoughts by reacting or replying!

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

8:32PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
8:32PM INF 103 commits scanned.
8:32PM INF scan completed in 79ms
8:32PM INF no leaks found

sonarcloud[bot] commented 3 months ago

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

GuilhermeStracini / cqrs-boilerplate-dotnet

Update deep-source.yml #107