Update sonar-cloud.yml - Githubissues

guibranco commented 4 months ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

Chores
- Updated CI workflow to rename job, change Java distribution to temurin, and update Java version to 21.
- Modified SonarCloud scanner setup to use specific organization and repository owner variables.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 4 months ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 4 months ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

instapr[bot] commented 4 months ago

The update looks good overall.  
Make sure to test the changes thoroughly before merging.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 4 months ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml:
- The job name has been changed from "build" to "SonarCloudAnalysis". This change is inconsistent as the job name should indicate its purpose directly.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml:
- Update the job name to clearly reflect its purpose, for example, "Sonar Cloud Analysis".
- Pay attention to consistent naming conventions across the workflow file.
- Ensure that comments and configurations are accurate and up-to-date for the Java setup and SonarCloud scanning steps.

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 4 months ago

:wave: Hi there!

Correct job name from "build" to "SonarCloudAnalysis" for clarity.
Update Java setup from version 17 with 'zulu' distribution to version 21 with 'temurin'.
Ensure consistency in naming conventions and maintain clear indentation for better readability.

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 4 months ago

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issue Counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	2	0

Summary of Proposed Changes

📖 Improved readability by renaming job and step names for consistency.
📖 Improved readability by reformatting the YAML file for better structure.
🛠️ Updated Java setup to use Temurin distribution and Java version 21.
🛠️ Changed the SonarCloud organization key to use ${{ github.repository_owner }} instead of ${{ vars.SONAR_ORG }}.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence
1	📖Readability	Job name changed from "build" to "SonarCloudAnalysis" for clarity	🟡Low	🟡Low
2	📖Readability	Step name changed from "Set up JDK 17" to "Set up Java" for consistency	🟡Low	🟡Low

Issue 1

ID: 1

Explanation: The job name was changed from "build" to "SonarCloudAnalysis" to make it more descriptive and clear.

Code:

jobs:
  SonarCloudAnalysis:
    name: Sonar Cloud Analysis

Fix Explanation: This change improves the readability of the workflow file by making the job name more descriptive.

Issue 2

ID: 2

Explanation: The step name was changed from "Set up JDK 17" to "Set up Java" to maintain consistency with the updated Java version and distribution.

Code:

- name: Set up Java
  uses: actions/setup-java@v4
  with:
    distribution: 'temurin'
    java-version: 21

Fix Explanation: This change improves the readability and consistency of the workflow file by updating the step name to reflect the new Java setup.

General Review

The proposed changes improve the readability and consistency of the workflow file. The job and step names are now more descriptive, and the Java setup has been updated to use the latest version and distribution. No critical issues were found.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Please add a reaction or reply to let me know your thoughts.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 4 months ago

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.

Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 75d85af43d67f506739a16e95d2d535d21e47e92 and 36d3f119f7e738de82cda3951aa8f8d17c345a9a.

Walkthrough

The workflow file sonar-cloud.yml has been updated to improve the CI configuration for SonarCloud analysis. These changes include renaming the job from build to SonarCloudAnalysis, switching the Java distribution to temurin, updating the Java version to 21, and adjusting the setup for the SonarCloud scanner to use specific organization and repository owner variables.

Changes

File	Summary
`.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml`	Renamed job from `build` to `SonarCloudAnalysis`, switched Java distribution to `temurin`, updated Java to version 21, modified SonarCloud scanner setup to use organization and repository owner variables.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
A workflow changed in a Java way.
We swapped to temurin, Java twenty-one,
For SonarCloud, our job's now done.
Variables aligned, and setup's right,
Code analysis shines, oh what a sight! 🌟

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 4 months ago

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!

Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 4 months ago

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

10:05PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:05PM INF 94 commits scanned.
10:05PM INF scan completed in 77.7ms
10:05PM INF no leaks found

GuilhermeStracini / cqrs-boilerplate-dotnet

Update sonar-cloud.yml #88