Add Infisical Secrets Check Workflow

guibranco commented 2 weeks ago

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

[ ] My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
[ ] My code requires changes to the documentation
[ ] I have updated the documentation as required
[ ] All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

ℹ Additional Information

[!NOTE] I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.

Description

Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow to check for secrets in the repository.
The workflow runs on pull requests and can also be triggered manually.
Utilizes the guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action for scanning.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

infisical-secrets-check.yml

Add Infisical Secrets Check Workflow

.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml

Added a new GitHub Actions workflow for secrets checking.

Configured the workflow to trigger on pull requests and manual
dispatch.

Set up a job to scan for secrets using a specific action.

+26/-0

💡 Penify usage: Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

Add a new GitHub Actions workflow to perform Infisical secrets check on pull requests and manual dispatch.

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for checking secrets in pull requests, enhancing security during code reviews.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

korbit-ai[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

You've used up your 5 PR reviews for this month under the Korbit Starter Plan. You'll get 5 more reviews on November 5th, 2024 or you can upgrade to Pro for unlimited PR reviews and enhanced features in your Korbit Console.

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Changes in the diff

➕ Added a new GitHub Actions workflow file named infisical-secrets-check.yml.
➕ Introduced a job to perform a secrets scan using the guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.10.
➕ Configured the workflow to trigger on workflow_dispatch and pull_request events.
➕ Set up concurrency to cancel in-progress runs for the same workflow and reference.

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the proposed changes. The workflow file is well-structured and follows best practices for GitHub Actions.

Missing Tests

Since this is a GitHub Actions workflow configuration, traditional unit tests do not apply. However, to ensure the workflow operates as expected, consider the following:

Manual Test: Trigger the workflow manually using the workflow_dispatch event to verify that it runs without errors and correctly performs the secrets check.
Pull Request Test: Create a test pull request to ensure the workflow triggers automatically and completes successfully.
Secrets Detection Test: Introduce a known secret in a test branch to verify that the secrets check action detects it and responds appropriately.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know your thoughts!

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request adds a new GitHub Actions workflow file named 'infisical-secrets-check.yml' to implement an automated secrets scanning process using Infisical. The workflow is designed to run on pull requests and can also be manually triggered.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Implementation of a new GitHub Actions workflow for secrets scanning	Workflow triggers on pull requests and manual dispatch Uses concurrency to manage multiple workflow runs Sets up a job named 'secrets-scan' on ubuntu-latest Configures necessary permissions for the job Checks out the repository with full history Utilizes the Infisical secrets check action	`.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml`

Tips and commands

#### Interacting with Sourcery - **Trigger a new review:** Comment `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - **Continue discussions:** Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments. - **Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment:** Ask Sourcery to create an issue from a review comment by replying to it. - **Generate a pull request title:** Write `@sourcery-ai` anywhere in the pull request title to generate a title at any time. - **Generate a pull request summary:** Write `@sourcery-ai summary` anywhere in the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use this command to specify where the summary should be inserted. #### Customizing Your Experience Access your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai) to: - Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request summary, the reviewer's guide, and others. - Change the review language. - Add, remove or edit custom review instructions. - Adjust other review settings. #### Getting Help - [Contact our support team](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) for questions or feedback. - Visit our [documentation](https://docs.sourcery.ai) for detailed guides and information. - Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on [X/Twitter](https://x.com/SourceryAI), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/sourcery-ai/) or [GitHub](https://github.com/sourcery-ai).

instapr[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

## 📑 Description
Added `.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml` for checking secrets in pull requests.

## ✅ Checks
- [x] My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
- [ ] My code requires changes to the documentation
- [x] I have updated the documentation as required
- [ ] All the tests have passed

## ☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - permissions:
- The pull-requests: write permission may pose security risks if the workflow is exposed to untrusted PRs. It's generally advisable to limit permissions to the minimum required for the job to function properly.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - job cancellation and concurrency:
- Consider adding a job key under concurrency. This will help maintain clear definitions of concurrency at both the workflow and job level. In this case, you might specify a job name explicitly for better clarity.
/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - environment variables:
- Consider using environment variables to manage sensitive data such as authentication tokens or API keys if required by the infisical-secrets-check-action. This ensures better security practices and avoids hardcoding sensitive information directly in the action settings.
/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - action versioning:
- Locking down action versions like guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.1.10 is generally good practice, but periodically review and update to the latest stable version to mitigate vulnerabilities or bugs. Consider using a more flexible versioning strategy, such as using semantic versioning (e.g., @v1) if you are comfortable with the risk.
/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - descriptive job names:
- Instead of naming your job secrets-scan, a more descriptive name that reflects the specific action being performed could enhance clarity. For instance, Infisical Secrets Scan makes it clearer what the job is intended to do.
/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - add failure handling:
- Consider adding error handling steps. For example, you can add notifications or alerts in case of failure to provide better insights into issues that occur during the secrets check process. This could involve services like Slack, email notifications, etc.

penify-dev[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the workflow file is straightforward and primarily consists of configuration for a GitHub Actions job.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

[!CAUTION]

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow file named infisical-secrets-check.yml has been added to the repository. This workflow is designed to run on workflow_dispatch and pull_request events. It includes a concurrency setting to manage runs by workflow name and reference. The workflow contains a single job, secrets-scan, which executes on an ubuntu-latest environment and performs a secrets check using the Infisical tool.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml	New workflow file added for Infisical secrets check.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub
    participant SecretsCheck

    User->>GitHub: Trigger workflow (pull_request)
    GitHub->>SecretsCheck: Start secrets-scan job
    SecretsCheck->>SecretsCheck: Checkout repository
    SecretsCheck->>SecretsCheck: Perform Infisical secrets check
    SecretsCheck-->>GitHub: Report results

🐰 In the garden, secrets hide,
With a scan, we will decide.
A workflow new, so spry and bright,
To keep our code safe, day and night!
🌼✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

github-actions[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

```txt 2:52AM INF scanning for exposed secrets... 2:52AM INF 7 commits scanned. 2:52AM INF scan completed in 63.5ms 2:52AM INF no leaks found ```

penify-dev[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Security	Adjust permissions to adhere to the principle of least privilege ___ Ensure that the `permissions` section includes only the necessary permissions to follow the principle of least privilege. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [15-17]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-cosmosdb-dotnet/pull/5/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R15-R17) ```diff permissions: contents: read - pull-requests: write + pull-requests: read ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Adjusting permissions to adhere to the principle of least privilege is crucial for security, minimizing potential risks.	9
Best practice	Specify a stable version for the checkout action to enhance reliability ___ Consider specifying a specific version of the `actions/checkout` action to avoid potential breaking changes in future releases. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [21]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-cosmosdb-dotnet/pull/5/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R21-R21) ```diff - name: Checkout repo - uses: actions/checkout@v4 + uses: actions/checkout@v2 ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Specifying a stable version for the checkout action enhances reliability and prevents unexpected issues from future updates.	8
Performance	Implement a timeout for the job to ensure it does not run indefinitely ___ Add a `timeout-minutes` setting to the job to prevent it from running indefinitely. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [13]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-cosmosdb-dotnet/pull/5/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R13-R13) ```diff secrets-scan: runs-on: ubuntu-latest + timeout-minutes: 10 ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Implementing a timeout for the job is a good practice to ensure it does not run indefinitely, improving resource management.	7
Maintainability	Add a descriptive name to the job for better clarity in logs ___ Consider adding a `name` for the job to improve clarity in the workflow logs. [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [13]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-cosmosdb-dotnet/pull/5/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R13-R13) ```diff secrets-scan: + name: Run Secrets Scan ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Adding a descriptive name to the job enhances clarity in logs, making it easier to understand the workflow's purpose.	6

GuilhermeStracini / hello-world-cosmosdb-dotnet