guibranco commented 2 weeks ago

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

[ ] My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
[ ] My code requires changes to the documentation
[ ] I have updated the documentation as required
[ ] All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

ℹ Additional Information

[!NOTE] I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.

Description

Updated the project title in README.md for improved clarity.
Removed the word "with" from the title to streamline the wording.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Documentation

README.md

Update project title in README.md for clarity

README.md

Updated the project title in the README.

Removed the word "with" from the title for clarity.

+1/-1

💡 Penify usage: Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

Summary by Sourcery

Documentation:

Update the README.md file to modify the project title by removing the word 'with'.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

korbit-ai[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

You've used up your 5 PR reviews for this month under the Korbit Starter Plan. You'll get 5 more reviews on November 5th, 2024 or you can upgrade to Pro for unlimited PR reviews and enhanced features in your Korbit Console.

instapr[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

## 📑 Description
- Update README.md

## ✅ Checks
- [x] My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
- [ ] My code requires changes to the documentation
- [x] I have updated the documentation as required
- [x] All the tests have passed

## ☢️  Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No

## ℹ Additional Information
- None

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

Title Clarity:
/README.md - The change in the header from "Hello World CosmosDB with C# .NET" to "Hello World CosmosDB C# .NET" may introduce ambiguity. The original title clearly indicates that the tutorial involves using C# .NET with CosmosDB. The new title could be misleading by implying that they are somehow synonymous, which may affect the initial understanding for newcomers to the project.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

Provide Additional Context in Title:
/README.md - Consider reintroducing the phrase "with" or similar wording back into the title, such as "Hello World CosmosDB using C# .NET" to enhance clarity about the relationship between CosmosDB and C# .NET, which can help users quickly grasp the purpose of the repository.

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request makes a minor update to the README.md file, changing the project title slightly. The change is minimal and doesn't affect the functionality of the project.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Updated the project title in the README	Removed 'with' from the title	`README.md`

Tips and commands

#### Interacting with Sourcery - **Trigger a new review:** Comment `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - **Continue discussions:** Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments. - **Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment:** Ask Sourcery to create an issue from a review comment by replying to it. - **Generate a pull request title:** Write `@sourcery-ai` anywhere in the pull request title to generate a title at any time. - **Generate a pull request summary:** Write `@sourcery-ai summary` anywhere in the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use this command to specify where the summary should be inserted. #### Customizing Your Experience Access your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai) to: - Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request summary, the reviewer's guide, and others. - Change the review language. - Add, remove or edit custom review instructions. - Adjust other review settings. #### Getting Help - [Contact our support team](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) for questions or feedback. - Visit our [documentation](https://docs.sourcery.ai) for detailed guides and information. - Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on [X/Twitter](https://x.com/SourceryAI), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/sourcery-ai/) or [GitHub](https://github.com/sourcery-ai).

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Changes in the diff

🛠️ Changed the title of the README from "Hello World CosmosDB with C# .NET" to "Hello World CosmosDB C# .NET" for a more concise title.

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the incoming changes.

Missing Tests

Since the change is only a modification to the README file's title, no additional tests are necessary. The change does not affect any code functionality or logic that would require testing.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Got thoughts? Don't hesitate to reply or add a reaction.

deepsource-io[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 79eec42..ccbbe11. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Test coverage	⚠️ Artifact not reported	Timed out: Artifact was never reported	View Check ↗
Shell	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Docker	✅ Success		View Check ↗
C#	✅ Success		View Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

penify-dev[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, involving only a title update in the README.md file.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No