GuilhermeStracini / hello-world-grafana-loki

📚 A repository to learn Grafana Loki
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Bump guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.693 to 2.2.696 #48

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 1 month ago

dependabot[bot] commented 1 month ago

Bumps guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.693 to 2.2.696.

Release notes

Sourced from guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2's releases.

Release v2.2.696

Release 2.2.696 of github-file-reader-action-v2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.2.695...v2.2.696

Release v2.2.695

Release 2.2.695 of github-file-reader-action-v2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.2.694...v2.2.695

Release v2.2.694

Release 2.2.694 of github-file-reader-action-v2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.2.693...v2.2.694

Commits


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
dependabot[bot] commented 1 month ago

The following labels could not be found: github-actions, dependencies.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 1 month ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. :tada: To get the most out of Senior Dev, please sign up in our Web App, connect your GitHub account, and add/join your organization GuilhermeStracini. After that, you will receive code reviews beginning on your next opened PR. :rocket:

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 1 month ago

:wave: Hi there!

Update the version of the github-file-reader-action-v2 to v2.2.696 for consistency in both instances. Consider combining the two steps that read secrets-result.log file into one step for clarity and simplicity, ensuring proper handling based on success or failure conditions. Check if any additional optimizations can be made for efficiency or code cleanliness.

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

instapr[bot] commented 1 month ago

Feedback

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 1 month ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - The version of github-file-reader-action-v2 has been updated for both Read secrets-result.log steps, but the version numbers in the uses field have not been updated consistently. This can lead to confusion and potential issues in the future.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - Ensure that the version number for the github-file-reader-action-v2 used in the Read secrets-result.log steps is consistent to avoid any discrepancies. It's recommended to update both occurrences to the same version (v2.2.696).
gooroo-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the proposed changes. The version bump appears to be straightforward and does not introduce any mistakes, typos, security issues, performance concerns, best practice violations, readability issues, or other concerns.

Missing Tests

No additional tests are required for this version bump, as it does not introduce new functionality or alter existing logic. The change is purely a dependency update.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to give your feedback!

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: -- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` -- `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` -- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` -- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` -- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` -- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 month ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 8429825..36ac9d8. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage⚠️ Artifact not reportedTimed out: Artifact was never reportedView Check ↗
DeepSource Shell LogoShell✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Docker LogoDocker✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource C# LogoC#✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
guibranco commented 1 month ago

@dependabot squash and merge

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

9:57AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
9:57AM INF 30 commits scanned.
9:57AM INF scan completed in 64.3ms
9:57AM INF no leaks found
dependabot[bot] commented 1 month ago

This PR has already been merged! 🎉

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 month ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud