GuilhermeStracini / hello-world-grafana-loki

📚 A repository to learn Grafana Loki
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Bump guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.698 to 2.2.699 #55

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 1 month ago

dependabot[bot] commented 1 month ago

Bumps guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.698 to 2.2.699.

Release notes

Sourced from guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2's releases.

Release v2.2.699

Release 2.2.699 of github-file-reader-action-v2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2/compare/v2.2.698...v2.2.699

Commits


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Summary by Sourcery

Bump the version of guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 used in the GitHub Actions workflow from 2.2.698 to 2.2.699 to incorporate the latest updates and improvements.

CI:

dependabot[bot] commented 1 month ago

The following labels could not be found: github-actions, dependencies.

korbit-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 1 month ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the proposed changes.

Explanation of the Changes

The proposed change in the diff is a simple version bump for the GitHub Action guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2. This update does not introduce any new features, bugs, or security issues. It is a straightforward maintenance update to ensure the workflow uses the latest version of the action.

Missing Tests

No new tests are necessary for this change, as it is a version update of a dependency in a GitHub Actions workflow file. The functionality of the workflow should be covered by existing tests that ensure the workflow runs as expected.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know your thoughts!

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

instapr[bot] commented 1 month ago
Reviewed changes look good. 👍
pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 1 month ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the version of the guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 GitHub Action from 2.2.698 to 2.2.699 in the Infisical secrets check workflow. The update is a minor version bump that includes an update to the @actions/core dependency.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Update guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from version 2.2.698 to 2.2.699
  • Change the version number from v2.2.698 to v2.2.699 in two separate uses of the action
  • Indirectly update @actions/core from 1.10.1 to 1.11.1 as part of the action update
.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml

Tips and commands #### Interacting with Sourcery - **Trigger a new review:** Comment `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - **Continue discussions:** Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments. - **Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment:** Ask Sourcery to create an issue from a review comment by replying to it. - **Generate a pull request title:** Write `@sourcery-ai` anywhere in the pull request title to generate a title at any time. - **Generate a pull request summary:** Write `@sourcery-ai summary` anywhere in the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use this command to specify where the summary should be inserted. #### Customizing Your Experience Access your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai) to: - Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request summary, the reviewer's guide, and others. - Change the review language. - Add, remove or edit custom review instructions. - Adjust other review settings. #### Getting Help - [Contact our support team](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) for questions or feedback. - Visit our [documentation](https://docs.sourcery.ai) for detailed guides and information. - Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on [X/Twitter](https://x.com/SourceryAI), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/sourcery-ai/) or [GitHub](https://github.com/sourcery-ai).
codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 1 month ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior.

  1. Duplicate Step Names:
    • File: .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • The step named "Read secrets-result.log" is duplicated. Although they have different conditions (if: always() and if: failure()), they are technically using the same name, which may lead to confusion and make it difficult to identify which step is being referred to in logs. It's better to have unique names for clarity.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency.

  1. Differentiate Step Names:

    • File: .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • Change the name of the second step to something more descriptive, like "Read secrets-result.log on failure" to clarify its purpose and avoid confusion with the first step.
  2. Version Management:

    • File: .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • Consider using a variable for the version of the action (v2.2.699) and define it at the top, so it can be easily updated in one place in the future. For example:
      env:
      ACTION_VERSION: v2.2.699
    • Then, use ${{ env.ACTION_VERSION }} in the action uses lines. This can help manage updates systematically.
coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 month ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits b9c9cbc..8f59b47. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage⚠️ Artifact not reportedTimed out: Artifact was never reportedView Check ↗
DeepSource Shell LogoShell✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Docker LogoDocker✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource C# LogoC#✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
guibranco commented 1 month ago

@dependabot squash and merge

dependabot[bot] commented 1 month ago

This PR has already been merged! 🎉

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

9:42AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
9:42AM INF 34 commits scanned.
9:42AM INF scan completed in 64ms
9:42AM INF no leaks found
sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 month ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud