The ecosystem, community size is missing (and is important for this kind of choice to be futur-proof)

GuillaumeRochat / container-orchestration-comparison

A comparison of the different container orchestration tools available.

120 stars 13 forks source link

The ecosystem, community size is missing (and is important for this kind of choice to be futur-proof) #3

Closed FGRibreau closed 7 years ago

FGRibreau commented 7 years ago

Kubernetes ( 1K+ contributors, 7122 forks...)
Docker swarm (161 contributors, 889 forks...)
Nomad (142 contributos, 398 forks...)
...

GuillaumeRochat commented 7 years ago

Hi @FGRibreau, aside from number of contributors and forks, do you think there are other valuable metrics to include to determine the community size?

FGRibreau commented 7 years ago

Hum, Google trend would give a trend but I'm not sure it would be really relevant. The documentation size could also be added but again it's hard to quantify :)

GuillaumeRochat commented 7 years ago

@FGRibreau I added the Stars, Forks and Contributors of the respective github repositories. I agree that Google trend would probably not be that relevant. For instance, Nomad would most likely not be referencing the Nomad tool.

FGRibreau commented 7 years ago

Indeed, perfect addition, thanks @KaivoAnastetiks!