✨ Add `bs.block:emit_block_particles`

[theogiraudet]

Tasks to do before merging

• [x] I accept to publish my contribution under MPL v2 License
• [x] My pull request is linked to an existing issue
• [x] I have added my contribution to the changelog
• If my pull request is a new or modify an existing feature:
  • [x] I have documented my contribution (/docs)
  • [x] I have added or updated the header of the features' root function I contribute
  • [x] I have tested my contribution

[aksiome]

Everything looks fine, i'm just not convinced by the name. All other spawn functions are summoning a new entity which is not really the case here. Maybe something like emit_block_particles would be more appropriate?

[theogiraudet]

I agree, but the folder is named "spawn" :/

[aksiome]

We can just move the function to an other folder. Also I think we should add a very simple test to just see if the run function is working (in case mojang change the particle command for example)

[theogiraudet]

For me, renaming the folder to "produce" would be a better idea. But this is a breaking change… +1 for the test.

[aksiome]

You can rename it it's not breaking change since functions are tagged and the internals are not supposed to be used directly. Im completly fine with this change

[theogiraudet]

Oh this is true, my bad. Let's do that, this name is better for new features.

[theogiraudet]

@aksiome I let you review the new version.