refacto: mutualize GDAL exception handler

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.65217% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 21.47%. Comparing base (eb9e3a8) to head (e4c845b).

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/253?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #253 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 21.42% 21.47% +0.04% ========================================== Files 37 37 Lines 2936 2864 -72 Branches 296 296 ========================================== - Hits 629 615 -14 + Misses 2275 2217 -58 Partials 32 32 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/253/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/253/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien) | `21.47% <95.65%> (+0.04%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/253?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [dicogis/georeaders/gdal\_exceptions\_handler.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/253?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fgeoreaders%2Fgdal_exceptions_handler.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9nZW9yZWFkZXJzL2dkYWxfZXhjZXB0aW9uc19oYW5kbGVyLnB5) | `80.00% <100.00%> (+20.00%)` | :arrow_up: | | [dicogis/georeaders/read\_dxf.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/253?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fgeoreaders%2Fread_dxf.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9nZW9yZWFkZXJzL3JlYWRfZHhmLnB5) | `13.20% <100.00%> (-0.83%)` | :arrow_down: | | [dicogis/georeaders/read\_esri\_filegdb.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/253?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fgeoreaders%2Fread_esri_filegdb.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9nZW9yZWFkZXJzL3JlYWRfZXNyaV9maWxlZ2RiLnB5) | `16.09% <100.00%> (-0.58%)` | :arrow_down: | | [dicogis/georeaders/read\_gxt.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/253?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fgeoreaders%2Fread_gxt.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9nZW9yZWFkZXJzL3JlYWRfZ3h0LnB5) | `18.30% <100.00%> (-1.45%)` | :arrow_down: | | [dicogis/georeaders/read\_raster.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/253?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fgeoreaders%2Fread_raster.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9nZW9yZWFkZXJzL3JlYWRfcmFzdGVyLnB5) | `10.44% <100.00%> (-0.74%)` | :arrow_down: | | [dicogis/georeaders/read\_vector\_flat\_dataset.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/253?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fgeoreaders%2Fread_vector_flat_dataset.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9nZW9yZWFkZXJzL3JlYWRfdmVjdG9yX2ZsYXRfZGF0YXNldC5weQ==) | `67.07% <100.00%> (+4.43%)` | :arrow_up: | | [dicogis/georeaders/read\_spatialite.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/253?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fgeoreaders%2Fread_spatialite.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9nZW9yZWFkZXJzL3JlYWRfc3BhdGlhbGl0ZS5weQ==) | `9.84% <50.00%> (-0.50%)` | :arrow_down: |

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud