refacto: rename module name into metadataset

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 26.53%. Comparing base (124f386) to head (2342281).

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/275?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #275 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 26.53% 26.53% ======================================= Files 37 37 Lines 2536 2536 Branches 322 322 ======================================= Hits 673 673 Misses 1818 1818 Partials 45 45 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/275/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/275/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien) | `26.53% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/275?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [dicogis/export/to\_xlsx.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/275?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fexport%2Fto_xlsx.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9leHBvcnQvdG9feGxzeC5weQ==) | `11.68% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [dicogis/georeaders/base\_georeader.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/275?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fgeoreaders%2Fbase_georeader.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9nZW9yZWFkZXJzL2Jhc2VfZ2VvcmVhZGVyLnB5) | `47.43% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [dicogis/georeaders/read\_postgis.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/275?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fgeoreaders%2Fread_postgis.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9nZW9yZWFkZXJzL3JlYWRfcG9zdGdpcy5weQ==) | `64.35% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [dicogis/georeaders/read\_raster.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/275?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fgeoreaders%2Fread_raster.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9nZW9yZWFkZXJzL3JlYWRfcmFzdGVyLnB5) | `20.89% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [dicogis/georeaders/read\_vector\_flat\_dataset.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/275?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fgeoreaders%2Fread_vector_flat_dataset.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9nZW9yZWFkZXJzL3JlYWRfdmVjdG9yX2ZsYXRfZGF0YXNldC5weQ==) | `46.25% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [dicogis/models/metadataset.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Guts/DicoGIS/pull/275?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=dicogis%2Fmodels%2Fmetadataset.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Julien#diff-ZGljb2dpcy9tb2RlbHMvbWV0YWRhdGFzZXQucHk=) | `77.64% <ø> (ø)` | |