Java classes should be organized in a way that better fits standard practices.
I believe we should consider renaming the standard package (e.g. to com.gymrattrax.scheduler, com.gymrattrax.app, or even com.gymrattrax) and then adding other packages to separate our classes (e.g. activities, receivers, services, models, etc.).
This would cause a huge amount of conflicts for anyone still working on something, so this could possibly be done during one of our meetings if no one has significant pending changes.
Copied from original issue: wford7/AndroidStudio#37
From @christopher-stone on April 6, 2015 22:24
Java classes should be organized in a way that better fits standard practices.
I believe we should consider renaming the standard package (e.g. to com.gymrattrax.scheduler, com.gymrattrax.app, or even com.gymrattrax) and then adding other packages to separate our classes (e.g. activities, receivers, services, models, etc.).
This would cause a huge amount of conflicts for anyone still working on something, so this could possibly be done during one of our meetings if no one has significant pending changes.
Copied from original issue: wford7/AndroidStudio#37