Open rburghol opened 2 years ago
Rob - thanks for starting. The file size issue is huge, both fig and literally. Mapping is great; they started trying a workflow on Thursday/Friday during the permissions fiasco related to mapping, thus have a good jump start. Continued reinforcement of language / definitions in model with physical processes is key. Last week I think Joey and I both talked with them about land segments, and how sometimes they are related to the county boundaries. For prepping related to HDF5, what are thoughts along this front? Seems like getting familiar with HSPF is first which is what you've been having them do.
Rob - I really like the idea of a "fact sheet" type Rmd, perhaps at the riverseg scale, with table showing all withdrawals within that riverseg? I'll need to do a little testing, but shouldn't be too much work applying the existing mapping tools for VWP to this type of Rmd. And cool yeah I helped reinforce some of those model concepts last week (rseg vs land seg vs landriverseg, showed them some navigation in VAHydro etc.). Looking forward to continuing and I think accessing this stuff with REST is a logical next step to allow them to play with some model data
Thanks for the follow up Scotty. For hdf5 I see 4 potential ways forward:
Thoughts? @jdkleiner
@rburghol see my general comment above for some thoughts. Looks like there is an hdf5r package in R that at least in theory should be able to handle retrieving/processing data in that format. Could be an area for the analysts to explore: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/hdf5r/hdf5r.pdf
I believe the HSPsquared repository itself also contains some tools for working with hdf5r data, but again those will be in python and we'd have to decide whether its worth having the analysts dive too far into python just yet.
Just saw your above comment Joey thanks -- Per the withdrawal table, I was actually thinking of the one that's in the existing VWP appendix. A great work piece could be a map of Roanoke watershed, the HSPF wdm export data, the hsp2 export data from R, and the nearest Usgs gauge, and a table of withdrawal data from VAHydro.
Note: I have already linked an issue above that I created using the RHDF5 module, I believe it's the same module that you're referring to. They could download all the files needed to run the demos from our GitHub repo, and access the data from R. It's not perfect, or it's not a perfect accompaniment to the hsp2 data that I've seen thus far :). But going through the process of working with something imperfect is certainly not a bad exercise… And not only is it an exercise but it's a reality so it actually moves us forward a little bit.
So an Rmd would be a goal for the end of the week, but my first inclination would be to have them both explore how to get a usable export from the HDF5 command line tools, and also explore how to fix the timestamp issue in the R module. These are things that we actually have to understand the difficulty of in order to make an informed choice. If someone could figure out how to access HDF5 in python that would complete a decision support package for us. So I guess that's my vote :)
is there a simple database file for them to explore, that contains data including a time-date cell?
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 10:37 AM rburghol @.***> wrote:
Just saw your above comment Joey thanks -- Per the withdrawal table, I was actually thinking of the one that's in the existing VWP appendix. A great work piece could be a map of Roanoke watershed, the HSPF wdm export data, the hsp2 export data from R, and the nearest Usgs gauge, and a table of withdrawal data from VAHydro.
Note: I have already linked an issue above that I created using the RHDF5 module, I believe it's the same module that you're referring to. They could download all the files needed to run the demos from our GitHub repo, and access the data from R. It's not perfect, or it's not a perfect accompaniment to the hsp2 data that I've seen thus far :). But going through the process of working with something imperfect is certainly not a bad exercise… And not only is it an exercise but it's a reality so it actually moves us forward a little bit.
So an Rmd would be a goal for the end of the week, but my first inclination would be to have them both explore how to get a usable export from the HDF5 command line tools, and also explore how to fix the timestamp issue in the R module. These are things that we actually have to understand the difficulty of in order to make an informed choice. If someone could figure out how to access HDF5 in python that would complete a decision support package for us. So I guess that's my vote :)
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/HARPgroup/HARParchive/issues/233#issuecomment-1161836104, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC4K42Y4LG7F65WP27BS7NLVQHHTNANCNFSM5ZMKRGZA . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>
--
Durelle Scott, Associate Professor and Assistant Department Head Virginia Tech | Biological Systems Engineering Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-2449 | @.***
Topics:
Project Management/Medium-Term Challenges