Test integration of new harp data harvesting

[rburghol]

Testing integration of these new routines (export and analysis, NOT batch) in the model

• Note: config/control/script/hsp2_2022.con has been created with the line
• Goose Creek:
  • cbp run_lug.csh p532sova_2021 OR2_7650_8070
  • cbp run_land.csh p532sova_2021 OR2_7650_8070
  • cbp run_rug.csh hsp2_2022 OR2_7650_8070
  • cbp run_river.csh hsp2_2022 OR2_7650_8070

[rburghol]

@glenncampagna @juliabruneau note that I just changed the scenario for the first two steps that were listed above. So the first two steps now use p532sova_2021, and then the next two steps use hsp2_2022.

Also note that this is for Goose Creek, which is not one of the ones that I had laid out previously, I was considering Goose Creek then changed my mind :). That's not to say that goose Creek is bad, in fact it might be awesome, but we should also do the Meherrin and the Rockfish river segments.

[juliabruneau]

@glenncampagna @juliabruneau note that I just changed the scenario for the first two steps that were listed above. So the first two steps now use p532sova_2021, and then the next two steps use hsp2_2022.

Also note that this is for Goose Creek, which is not one of the ones that I had laid out previously, I was considering Goose Creek then changed my mind :). That's not to say that goose Creek is bad, in fact it might be awesome, but we should also do the Meherrin and the Rockfish river segments.

We created an issue for Rockfish as it was stated in the weekly issue, and tried to run the above commands with it #443 Test Watershed - Rockfish: JL2_6850_6890.