Open ajelenak opened 2 years ago
Why does 0_1 have a url key but 0_0 does not?
How about using the same storage methods (e.g. CHUNK_REF_INDIRECT, etc.) that HSDS uses?
Another idea would be to have an option to store the chunk data directly in the file (hex encoded). So offset would be a byte office in the file itself. This is what ASDF does.
I think byteBlocks
should have a key whose value indicates the blocking scheme, which would also explain how to interpret the block keys. Right now, the assumption appears to be that there's one block per chunk. That's not very flexible. Remember Francesc's sub-blocking scheme for Blosc for better selectivity, etc.? There also might be sparse chunks at some point.
Why does 0_1 have a url key but 0_0 does not?
Just illustrate both possible options. In a real case, only one would be used.
How about using the same storage methods (e.g. CHUNK_REF_INDIRECT, etc.) that HSDS uses?
Does this require an additional anonymous dataset?
H5D_CHUNKREF and H5D_CHUNKREF_INDIRECT are documented here: https://github.com/HDFGroup/hsds/blob/master/docs/design/single_object/SingleObject.md.
H5D_CHUNKED_REF
could work, although "chunk" is a very important term and some may find it confusing in this context.
Here's the updated example. It includes H5D_CHUNKED_REF
as layout and new index_schema
key inside byteBlocks
.
The block index schema is defined with a URI and its index separator is included as well for convenience. There are also url
keys to illustrate both cases: a single resource with all the blocks or different resources for each block.
{
"datasets": {
"7f335a2e-7ab1-11e4-87a5-3c15c2da029e": {
"attributes": [],
"dcpl": {
"fillValue": 0,
"layout": {
"class": "H5D_CHUNKED_REF",
"dims": [8]
}
},
"shape": {
"class": "H5S_SIMPLE",
"dims": [10, 10],
"maxdims": [10, 10]
},
"type": {
"base": "H5T_STD_I32BE",
"class": "H5T_INTEGER"
},
"url": "s3://mybucket/path/to/object/where/all/blocks/are",
"byteBlocks": {
"index_schema": {
"uri": "https://schema.hdfgroup.org/hdf5-json/block/index/regular",
"separator": "_"
},
"0_0": {
"offset": 1234,
"size": 2567,
"url": "s3://mybucket/path/to/block/object1"
},
"0_1": {
"offset": 56789,
"size": 1967,
"url": "s3://mybucket/path/to/block/object2"
}
}
}
}
}
This is a proposal to add dataset storage information to HDF5/JSON. JSON key for this is named
byteBlocks
. The word "block" is hopefully still technically accurate while not too similar to "chunk".Below is an example for one dataset. Block JSON keys are in the same format as in the HSDS schema, e.g.
0_0
and0_1
. Two blocks are in the example; the0_1
block has an optionalurl
key in case of remote blocks. Theurl
key can also apply to the entire dataset, in which case cannot appear in the blocks.cc: @derobins @jreadey @gheber