Test 3.2.0 - Githubissues

I think the 3.2 notebook is in good shape. Some of the language in the summary could be potentially cleaned up. I used "mutual coupling" throughout most of the document instead of directly calling it xtalk or cross-talk. I thought there was some discussion about this recently, but that can be easily changed if we feel the language is too different from other xtalk related documents.

I don't know exactly what we wanted to show in this test. But I think the plots at the end with incoherently averaged delay power spectra show the performance of:

the reflection calibration for an autocorrelation power spectrum
the mutual coupling systematic removal for an EW baseline for
- multiple spws
- multiple baseline lengths This list certainly isn't exhaustive, but I think it covers most of the bases I could think of for this test. I think these plots show that the refcal and xtalk_sub functions work with the major caveat that the datasets used here were noiseless, so substantial signal loss is expected (and observed).

HERA-Team / hera-validation

Test 3.2.0 #62