Closed bhazelton closed 1 year ago
This PR is failing a bunch of tests... do we expect it to pass before pyuvdata 3.0?
Sigh. I though it would but I forgot that I fixed the spelling of the flags_array
to flag_array
in write_uvh5_part
because it didn't match the spelling throughout the rest of the code base. I'll fix it to work now and in the future, it'll just be a little clunky.
Patch coverage: 88.88%
and project coverage change: -0.01%
:warning:
Comparison is base (
5693047
) 97.19% compared to head (822d0cb
) 97.18%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Ok, I made the issue. What do you want to do about the code coverage? I can add a pragma: no cover
to the code branch for pyuvdata > 3.0 if you like. The other line was apparently already not covered, I just made the syntax pep8 compliant.
I can live with the tiny decrease in coverage.
This future proofs for pyuvdata v3.0 which is coming soonish.