codecov[bot]
commented
6 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
b045b6e) 97.16% compared to head (1cac6ce) 97.15%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #927 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 97.16% 97.15% -0.01% ========================================== Files 23 23 Lines 10638 10692 +54 ========================================== + Hits 10336 10388 +52 - Misses 302 304 +2 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/HERA-Team/hera_cal/pull/927/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=HERA-Team) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/HERA-Team/hera_cal/pull/927/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=HERA-Team) | `97.15% <100.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=HERA-Team#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This adds several options to a new
sigma_clip()function, includingclip_typewhich specifies whether data should be directly clipped or accumulated over some axis before assessing the threshold. A placeholder for allowing the expected variance to be passed has also been added, but not piped through (i.e. you can't specify this on the CLI yet).The reason that the expected variance can't be piped through easily is that there's no obvious way of getting the auto spectra that works for both redundantly averaged and non-averaged data input.