Closed r-pascua closed 2 years ago
Merging #202 (cfc295c) into main (e9f82ab) will increase coverage by
0.00%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #202 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.58% 96.59%
=======================================
Files 24 24
Lines 2785 2787 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 2690 2692 +2
Misses 95 95
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
hera_sim/sigchain.py | 98.41% <100.00%> (+0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 36bff85...cfc295c. Read the comment docs.
I forgot to make sure that the new cross-coupling model is only applied to cross-correlations. This has been fixed.
What's the reasoning to apply this only to cross correlations? I think that the autos might be a good place to check for over-the-air cross-talk effects as well.
@aewallwi this model is only valid for the cross-correlations. The autos would need a different model. In particular, the contribution to the visibility from cross-coupling would be the sum of all of the cross-correlations, with each cross-correlation scaled by an appropriate choice of reflection coefficient. The model here would effectively rescale the input auto to (1 + eps) times itself, with eps being the reflection coefficient for the particular antenna. In the previous validation effort, we also excluded cross-coupling from the autos, since it's effectively a second-order effect.
For reference, see Equation 12 in HERA Memo 64.
@r-pascua Ah! Thanks for clarifying! I thought this was for the Josaitis cross-talk model. This is definitely fine with me!
Oh add to the changelog :-)
Thanks for the reminder! I will log the changes.
I forgot to make sure that the new cross-coupling model is only applied to cross-correlations. This has been fixed.