A historical JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) record was found for this project inside of code.gov, and pasted toward the end. If it is possible to accept questions about part of that JSON record, some are ....
Can the languages object in the JSON file be updated to add Python language? Python wrappers were observed at one related link, https://github.com/eyeseast/pillbox
Is it a good idea to add a name for an organization or component within agency HHS? Currently the JSON file has a top level Department of Health and Human Services. Examples of organizations or components within an agency were '18F' or 'Navy'.
Would the following change be acceptable to improve the description, or is it inaccurate, incomplete?
current: Pillbox at the National Library of Medicine
change: The Pillbox API identifies unknown pills based on how they look, their ingredients, and a few other criteria.
The download URL reports 404, page not found. Is it acceptable to remove this JSON object while a web/http response does not succeed? It appears to be an optional JSON object.
Is the "Development" status still accurate for this project? Prepared status options from the JSON schema were: "Ideation", "Development", "Alpha", "Beta", "Release Candidate", "Production", "Archival".
Either I made a mistake, or else a question if the "lastModified": "2021-11-08" date is accurate in the JSON file. The repositoryURL and homepageURL seemed to go to the same web page, maybe one has a redirect going to the same place as the other. In any case, the resulting page supplied an activity report, and no activity was observed. Observing no activity caused a question about development status.
Is there a chance to add something to the reusedCode object, since the github repo says there were some forks?
{
"name": "pillbox_docs",
"description": "Pillbox at the National Library of Medicine",
"status": "Development",
"permissions": {
"usageType": "openSource",
"licenses": null
},
"organization": "Department of Health and Human Services",
"homepageURL": "https://github.com/HHS/pillbox_docs",
"downloadURL": "https://api.github.com/repos/HHS/pillbox_docs/downloads",
"repositoryURL": "https://github.com/HHS/pillbox_docs.git",
"vcs": "git",
"laborHours": 0.0,
"languages": [
"Ruby"
],
"date": {
"created": "2009-12-12",
"lastModified": "2021-11-08",
"metadataLastUpdated": "2022-03-22"
},
"tags": [
"Pillbox",
"National",
"Library",
"Medicine"
],
"contact": {
"email": "HHS_GitHub_Service_Desk@hhs.gov",
"name": "U.S. Department of Health & Human Services"
}
}
A historical JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) record was found for this project inside of code.gov, and pasted toward the end. If it is possible to accept questions about part of that JSON record, some are ....
Can the languages object in the JSON file be updated to add Python language? Python wrappers were observed at one related link, https://github.com/eyeseast/pillbox
Is it a good idea to add a name for an organization or component within agency HHS? Currently the JSON file has a top level Department of Health and Human Services. Examples of organizations or components within an agency were '18F' or 'Navy'.
Would the following change be acceptable to improve the description, or is it inaccurate, incomplete? current: Pillbox at the National Library of Medicine change: The Pillbox API identifies unknown pills based on how they look, their ingredients, and a few other criteria.
The download URL reports 404, page not found. Is it acceptable to remove this JSON object while a web/http response does not succeed? It appears to be an optional JSON object.
Is the "Development" status still accurate for this project? Prepared status options from the JSON schema were: "Ideation", "Development", "Alpha", "Beta", "Release Candidate", "Production", "Archival". Either I made a mistake, or else a question if the "lastModified": "2021-11-08" date is accurate in the JSON file. The repositoryURL and homepageURL seemed to go to the same web page, maybe one has a redirect going to the same place as the other. In any case, the resulting page supplied an activity report, and no activity was observed. Observing no activity caused a question about development status.
Is there a chance to add something to the reusedCode object, since the github repo says there were some forks?
{ "name": "pillbox_docs", "description": "Pillbox at the National Library of Medicine", "status": "Development", "permissions": { "usageType": "openSource", "licenses": null }, "organization": "Department of Health and Human Services", "homepageURL": "https://github.com/HHS/pillbox_docs", "downloadURL": "https://api.github.com/repos/HHS/pillbox_docs/downloads", "repositoryURL": "https://github.com/HHS/pillbox_docs.git", "vcs": "git", "laborHours": 0.0, "languages": [ "Ruby" ], "date": { "created": "2009-12-12", "lastModified": "2021-11-08", "metadataLastUpdated": "2022-03-22" }, "tags": [ "Pillbox", "National", "Library", "Medicine" ], "contact": { "email": "HHS_GitHub_Service_Desk@hhs.gov", "name": "U.S. Department of Health & Human Services" } }